Skip to main content
BIR Radiation and Oncology Meeting 2022
Full Paper

Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/53924376

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the change in patient radiation dose in the radiological investigation of pulmonary embolism since the introduction of helical CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in a large teaching hospital. All radiological investigations performed as an integral part of the imaging protocol in the investigation of clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were retrospectively reviewed. The protocol for the investigation of PE changed in our institution after the introduction of CTPA. Protocols 1 and 2 were the protocols in place before and after the introduction of CTPA, respectively. An in-depth evaluation was made of the imaging records and radiation dose for 30 consecutive patients investigated for clinically suspected PE in 1995 (protocol 1) and 2002 (protocol 2). Radiation doses were then extrapolated for the total number of patients investigated in each year. The number of radiological investigations performed per patient decreased from a mean of 1.17 in protocol 1 to 1.06 in protocol 2. There was a 44% increase in the total number of patients investigated. The effective dose per patient increased from 1.30 mSv to 1.35 mSv with the introduction of CTPA into the imaging protocol, an increase of only 4%. First line investigations showed a significant decrease in indeterminate examinations from 25.7% to 8.5%. Two different imaging protocols are reviewed with respect to type and number of procedures required for the investigation of PE and the resulting patient effective dose incurred. Results demonstrate an increase in the number of patients being investigated for suspected PE and a small increase in effective dose per patient since the introduction of helical CTPA. Although CTPA in itself incurs a higher effective dose, this is offset by the significant decrease in the number of non-diagnostic and total number of investigations per patient. In addition the ventilation component of lung scintigraphy was not required in protocol 2, thus reducing the dose further. We believe this small increase in effective dose is justified by the decrease in non-diagnostic studies and the reduction in total number of investigations per patient. We hope this paper will serve as a stimulus for the radiology community to examine current protocols in all areas of diagnostic imaging. We stress the importance of assessing new and established imaging investigative protocols to maximize the benefit and reduce any risk to patients.

References

  • 1 Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Natural history of pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1975;17:259–70. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Moser KM. State of the art: venous thromboembolism. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;414:235–49. Crossref ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevesky M, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1240–5. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Ginsberg JS. Management of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1817–28. Google Scholar

  • 5 British Thoracic Society. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a practical approach. Thorax 1997;52:s1–24. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 6 Murchison JT, Gavan DR, Reid JH. Clinical utilization of the non-diagnostic lung scintigram. Clin Radiol 1997;52:295–8. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 7 Safriel Y, Zinn H. CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary emboli. A meta-analysis of sensitivities and specificities. J Clin Imaging 2002;26:101–5. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Hansell DM. Spiral computed tomography and pulmonary embolism: current state. Clin Radiol 1997;52:575–81. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, Artaud D, Borgi JP, Hossein-Foucher C, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 1996;200:699–706. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 10 Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS. Acute pulmonary embolism: the role of computed tomographic imaging. J Thorac Imag 1997;12:83–6. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Fennerty T. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. BMJ 1997;314:425–9. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 12 Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF, Stanson AW, Johnson CM, Brear J, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1995;194:313–9. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 13 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single breath-hold technique—comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992;185:381–7. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 14 http://www.impactscan.org/ctdosimetry.htm Google Scholar

  • 15 Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. Chilton: NRPB, 1998. Google Scholar

  • 16 Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF. Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. NRPB-R262. Chilton: NRPB, 1995. Google Scholar

  • 17 International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP pub 60. Oxford: Pergamon, 1991. Google Scholar

  • 18 Jones DG, Shrimpton PC. Normalised organ doses for X-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB software report SR250. Chilton: NRPB, 1993. Google Scholar

  • 19 Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K. Survey of CT practice in the UK Part 2: Dosimetric aspects. NRPB-R249. Chilton: NRPB, 1991. Google Scholar

Volume 78, Issue 925January 2005
Pages: 1-90

© The British Institute of Radiology


History

  • ReceivedOctober 07,2003
  • RevisedAugust 23,2004
  • AcceptedSeptember 17,2004
  • Published onlineJanuary 28,2014

Metrics