Skip to main content
Diagnostic Imaging Europe. The European portal for diagnostic imaging.
Full Paper

Effects of projective bone area size of the spine on bone density and the diagnosis of osteoporosis in healthy pre-menopausal women in China

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/36670654

Abstract

The aim of this study was to understand the effects of projective bone area (BA) size of the spine on bone density and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Measurements of BA, bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone density (aBMD) and volumetric bone density (vBMD) at the posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine (vertebrae L2–L4) followed by a paired PA/lateral spine (L2–L4) were made using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam bone densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) in 1436 healthy pre-menopausal women aged from 20 to 56-years-old. At the PA and lateral lumbar spine, there was a significant positive correlation between BA and BMC (r=0.762 and 0.762, p=0.000) and aBMD (r=0.370 and 0.352, p=0.000), but not vBMD (r=0.000 and 0.102, p=0.813 and 0.063). When BA at the PA spine changed by one standard deviation (SD), BMC and aBMD correspondingly changed by 12.6% and 4.3% on the basis of their respective means while vBMD indicated no change. When a variation of 1 SD was observed in BA at the lateral spine, BMC, aBMD and vBMD correspondingly changed by 13.8%, 4.4% and 1.73% on the basis of their respective means. Through an intercomparison among large, intermediate and small BA groups, significant differences were found in the means of subject's height, weight, BMC and aBMD at the PA and lateral spine as well as the detection rate of osteoporosis by aBMD (p=0.000). Detection rates of osteoporosis by aBMD at the PA, lateral spine and vBMD in healthy pre-menopausal women aged from 40 years to 56 years were 4.5%, 16.4% and 9.7%, respectively, in the small BA group; 1.3%, 6.4% and 7.3%, respectively, in the intermediate BA group; and 0, 0 and 5.5%, respectively, in the large BA group. No significant differences were found in the detection rates of osteoporosis by vBMD among the groups. The results of multiple linear regression revealed that the major factors influencing BA of the lumbar spine was height. In healthy pre-menopausal women of the same race and age, the BA size of the lumbar spine would have significant influence upon aBMD and the diagnosis of osteoporosis, i.e. the larger the BA, the greater the aBMD and the lower the osteoporosis detection rate while conversely, the smaller the BA, the smaller the aBMD and the higher the osteoporosis detection rate. Though vBMD does not change with BA sizes of the lumbar spine, it is a sensitive marker for diagnosing osteoporosis.

References

  • 1 Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL, De Coteau WE, McKay HA, Bailey DA, et al. Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:271–5. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R, Loro ML, Roe TF, Goodman WG. Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 1994;190:678–82. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Melton LJ 3rd, Khosla S, Achenbach BJ, O'Connor MK, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Effects of body size and skeletal site on the estimated prevalence of osteoporosis in women and men. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:977–83. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Seeman E. From density of structure: growing up and growing old on the surfaces of bone. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:509–21. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 5 Bachrach LK, Hastie T, Wang MC, Narasimhan B, Marcus R. Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, Black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:4702–12. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 6 Melton LJ III. The prevalence of osteoporosis: gender and racial comparison. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;69:179–81. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 7 Bhudhikanok GS, Wang MC, Eckert K, Matkin C, Marcus R, Bachrach LK. Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1545–56. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Marquez MA, Melton LJ 3rd, Muhs JM, Crowson CS, Tosomeen A, O'Conner MK, et al. Bone density in an immigrant population from Southeast Asia. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:595–604. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Marcus R, Greendale G, Blunt BA, Bush TL, Sherman S, Sherwin R, et al. Correlates of bone mineral density in the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions trial. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1467–76. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 10 Cundy T, Cornish J, Evans MC, Gamble G, Stapleton J, Reid IR. Sources of interracial variation in bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:368–73. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Bonnick SL, Johnston CC Jr, Kleerekoper M, Lindsay R, Miller P, Sherwood L, et al. Importance of precision in bone density measurements. J Clin Densitom 2001;4:105–10. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 12 World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis technical report series 843. Geneva: WHO, 1994. Google Scholar

  • 13 Liao EY, Wu XP, Deng XG, Huang G, Zhu XP, Long ZF, et al. Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:669–76. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 14 Peel NF, Eastell R. Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:17–20. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 15 Lu PW, Cowell CT, Lloyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R. Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5–27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:1586–90. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 16 Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FMA, Fogelman I. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 1993;66:902–6. Link ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 17 Pors Nielsen S, Kolthoff N, Bärenholdt O, Kristensen B, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, et al. Diagnosis of osteoporosis by planar bone densitometry: can body size be disregarded? Br J Radiol 1998;71:934–43. Link ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 18 Seeman E. Growth in bone mass and size. Are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:1414–9. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 19 Tsai SC, Kao CH, Wang SJ, Changlai SP, Yen RF, Chien PU. Normal data for lumbar spine bone mineral content in healthy Chinese men. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;61:114–6. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 20 Kao CH, Chen CC, Wang SJ. Normal data for lumbar spine bone mineral content in healthy elderly Chinese: influence of sex, age, obesity and ethnicity. Nucl Med Commun 1994;15:916–20. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 21 Russell-Aulet M, Wang J, Thornton JC, Colt EW, Pierson RN Jr. Bone mineral density and mass in a cross-sectional study of white and Asian women. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:575–82. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 22 Delezé M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR, Morales-Torres J, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG, Calva JJ, et al. Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:562–9. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 23 Woodson G, Atlanta MD. The supine lateral site is more sensitive for the diagnosis of osteoporosis than other axial DXA sites. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:S379 (abstract). Google Scholar

  • 24 Arlot ME, Sornay-Rendu E, Garnero P, Vey-Marty B, Delmas PD. Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: The OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:683–90. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 25 Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T. The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1202–7. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 26 Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA. A longitudinal study of the effect of spinal degenerative disease on bone density in the elderly. J Rheumatol 1995;22:932–6. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 27 Szulc P, Marchand F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Cross-sectional assessment of age-related bone loss in men: the MINOS Study. Bone 2000;26:123–9. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 28 Finkelstein JS, Cleary RL, Butler JP, Antonelli R, Mitlak BH, Deraska DJ, et al. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;78:724–30. Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 29 Jergas M, Genant HK. Lateral dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: current status. Bone 1997;20:311–4. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 30 Faulkner KG, Stetten E, Miller P. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 1999;2:343–50. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 31 Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 2001;19:331–7. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 32 Melton LJ 3rd, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, O'Connor MK, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Cross-sectional versus longitudinal evaluation of bone loss in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:592–9. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 33 Gilsanz V, Loro ML, Roe TF, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz EE. Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures. J Clin Invest 1995;95:2332–7. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 34 Mazess RB, Barden H, Mautalen C, Vega E. Normalization of spine densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:541–8. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 35 Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Mautalen C, Rey Valzacchi G, Scaglia H, Zylberstein C. Bone mineral density and bone size in men with primary osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:465–9. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 36 Jergas M, Breitenseher M, Gluer CC, Yu W, Genant HK. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:1101–10. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

Volume 76, Issue 907July 2003
Pages: 433-507

© The British Institute of Radiology


History

  • RevisedDecember 20,2002
  • ReceivedAugust 19,2002
  • AcceptedApril 24,2003
  • Published onlineJanuary 28,2014

Metrics