Skip to main content
Diagnostic Imaging Europe. The European portal for diagnostic imaging.
Full Paper

Prevalence of osteoporotic bone mineral density at the hip in Britain differs substantially from the US over 50 years of age: implications for clinical densitometry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.897.750736

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare hip bone mineral density (BMD) recorded in seven population based cohorts in Britain with the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) US population-based reference data, in order to assess geographic variation in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Men and women aged 50–80+ years were randomly recruited from population and health registers. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) equipment was used to measure BMD at the hip, with the femoral neck and the trochanter regions studied. Prevalences of osteopenia and osteoporosis were estimated in accordance with World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria for women. Young normal data, used to establish cut-off criteria, was from NHANES III. Both male and female British subjects over 50-years-old were found to have significantly higher mean BMD at the femoral neck and trochanter than their US counterparts. Decline in BMD with age in British men appeared slower than in US men. Between British centres there were also statistically significant differences in BMD values in both sexes. British age-adjusted prevalences of osteopenia in women averaged 20% less than those of NHANES III, whereas the prevalence of osteoporosis was substantially lower in British subjects of both sexes (55% in women, 68% in men). Thus, applying the US NHANES III data as the referent, osteoporosis of the proximal femur in Britain appears to be less common than in the US, due primarily to differences in the lower tails of the BMD distributions. Providing that the relationship between fracture rates and BMD is the same in Britain and the US, it would still be appropriate to apply the reference data in fracture risk assessment in the UK.

References

  • 1 Kanis J, Melton III L, Christiansen C, Johnston C, Khaltaev N. Perspective: the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1137–41. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 2 Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1761–8. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 3 Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, et al. Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:468–89. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 4 National Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 1998;8(Suppl. 4):S7–S80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5 O'Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ, et al. The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1010–7. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 6 Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Benevolenskaya L, Cannata J, Dequeker J, et al. Bone density variation and its effects on risk of vertebral deformity in men and women studied in 13 European centres: the EVOS Study. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1883–94. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 7 Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Adams J, Benevolenskaya L, Cannata J, Dequeker J, et al. Population-based geographic variations in DXA bone density in Europe: the EVOS study. Osteoporos Int 1997;7:175–89. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 8 Murphy S, Khaw K-T, May H, Compston JE. Milk consumption and bone mineral density in middle-aged and elderly women. BMJ 1994;308:939–40. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 9 Jakes RW, Khaw KT, Day NE, Bingham S, Welch A, Oakes S, et al. Patterns of physical activity behaviour and heel bone density: the EPIC-Norfolk study. BMJ 2001;322:140–3. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 10 Orwoll E. Assessing bone density in men. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:1867–70. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 11 Pearson J, Dequeker J, Henley M, Bright J, Reeve J, Kalender W, et al. European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:174–84. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 12 Pearson J, Dequeker J, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Henley M, Bright J, et al. Dual X-Ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur: normal European values standardised with the European spine phantom. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:315–24. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 13 Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996;312:1254–9. Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • 14 Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW. Structural trends in the ageing femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the third national health and nutrition examination survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:2297–308. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 15 Gibson JH, Harries M, Mitchell A, Godfrey R, Lunt M, Reeve J. Determinants of bone density and prevalence of osteopenia among female runners in their second to seventh decades of age. Bone 2000;26:591–8. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 16 Looker AC, Johnston CCJ, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, et al. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US women from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:796–802. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 17 O'Neill TW, Marsden D, Silman AJ, on behalf of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Differences in the characteristics of responders and nonresponders in a prevalence survey of vertebral osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:327–34. Crossref Medline ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 18 Petley GW, Cotton AM, Murrills AJ, Taylor PA, Cooper C, Cawley MID, et al. Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in southern England: the impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1996;69:655–60. Link ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 19 Cooper C. Epidemiology and public health impact of osteoporosis. In: Reid DM, editor. Baillière's Clinical Rheumaology. London: Baillière Tindall; 1993;459–77. Google Scholar

Volume 75, Issue 897September 2002
Pages: 717-784

© The British Institute of Radiology


History

  • ReceivedAugust 21,2001
  • RevisedFebruary 14,2002
  • AcceptedApril 16,2002
  • Published onlineJanuary 28,2014

Metrics