Skip to main content
Full paper

Procedure for quantitatively assessing automatic exposure control in mammography: a study of the GE Senographe 600 TS


The correct operation of a mammography system's automatic exposure control system (AEC) is essential if mammograms are to be produced with a suitable film exposure. A methodology has been developed that allows the performance of the AEC to be assessed quantitatively using clinical films. By digitizing mammograms, the mean optical density (OD) in the main breast region and in a region of interest corresponding to the position of the AEC detector are evaluated for each film, together with the area of the main breast. Using these data it is possible to determine the relationships between the mean OD, breast size and AEC detector position. The performance of the AEC on a GE Senographe 600 TS system was investigated. The study found that there is a tendency to underexpose smaller breasts, i.e. with an area less than approximately 4000 mm2. This is equivalent to a compressed tissue width of approximately 60–80 mm. The difference in mean OD between the mammograms of small and large breasts was up to 0.7 OD. Provided the sensitive area of the AEC detector is known, this method of assessing AEC performance can be used with any mammography system.


  • 1 Law J, Dance DR, Faulkner K, Fitzgerald MC, Ramsdale ML, Robinson A. The commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems, IPSM Report No. 59 (2nd edn). York: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, 1994. Google Scholar

  • 2 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems, IPEM Report No. 77 (1st edn). York: IPEM, 1997. Google Scholar

  • 3 Meeson S, Young KC, Ramsdale ML, Wallis MG, Cooke J. Analysis of optical density and contrast in mammograms. Br J Radiol 1999;72:670–7. Link ISIGoogle Scholar

  • 4 Meeson S, Young KC, Rust R, Ramsdale ML, Wallis MG, Cooke J. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film–screen combinations. Br J Radiol (in press). Google Scholar

  • 5 Young KC, King S, Meeson S, Ramsdale ML, Cooke J, Wallis MG. Auditing the image quality of mammograms. Radiat Prot Dosim 2000;90:279–82. Crossref ISIGoogle Scholar

Volume 74, Issue 883July 2001
Pages: 571-671

© The British Institute of Radiology


  • ReceivedAugust 09,2000
  • AcceptedApril 04,2001
  • Published onlineMarch 05,2014