The role of MRI-based texture analysis to predict the severity of brain injury in neonates with perinatal asphyxia
Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of the MRI-based texture analysis (TA) of the basal ganglia and thalami to distinguish moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from mild HIE in neonates.
Methods:
This study included 68 neonates (15 with mild, 20 with moderate-to-severe HIE, and 33 control) were born at 37 gestational weeks or later and underwent MRI in first 10 days after birth. The basal ganglia and thalami were delineated for TA on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, T1-, and T2 weighted images. The basal ganglia, thalami, and the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) were also evaluated visually on diffusion-weighted imaging and T1 weighted sequence. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analyses were used.
Results:
Totally, 56 texture features for the basal ganglia and 46 features for the thalami were significantly different between the HIE groups on the ADC maps, T2-, and T2 weighted sequences. Using a Histogram_entropy log-10 value as >1.8 from the basal ganglia on the ADC maps (p < 0.001; OR, 266) and the absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1 weighted images (p = 0.012; OR, 17.11) were found as independent predictors for moderate-to-severe HIE. Using only a Histogram_entropy log-10 value had an equal diagnostic yield when compared to its combination with other texture features and imaging findings.
Conclusion:
The Histogram_entropy log-10 value can be used as an indicator to differentiate from moderate-to-severe to mild HIE.
Advances in knowledge:
MRI-based TA may provide quantitative findings to indicate different stages in neonates with perinatal asphyxia.
Introduction
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the most devastating results of perinatal asphyxia.1 Sarnat score is most commonly used clinical scoring system for evaluating the severity of neonatal HIE. Patients are classified as mild (Stage 1), moderate (Stage 2), and severe (Stage 3) HIE according to the Sarnat criteria, which is based on the clinical signs and electroencephalographic results.2 Determining the severity of brain injury and staging of HIE is crucial, as it plays an important role in establishing neuroprotective therapeutic options and predicting long-term outcome.3
The imaging patterns of hypoxic injury vary depending on the severity and duration of insult, gestational age, and the timing of imaging. MRI is the best modality for evaluating suspected HIE.4 Abnormal signal intensities can be usually detected in basal ganglia and thalamus, which are known as the vulnerable sites to oxidative stress, in neonates with severe HIE.4,5 However, it is reported that neurologic deficits may also occur in some neonates with normal brain MRI findings.6,7
Although MRI is an indispensable imaging modality for various clinical situations, it can provide limited information that is based on human eye perception. Furthermore, unmyelinated brain structure with high-water content in newborns makes the discrimination of the pathologic signal and the evaluation of brain MRI more difficult. Recently, texture analysis (TA) as a radiomic approach has been widely used for non-invasive quantitative evaluation of different pathological conditions. TA allows extracting the data of gray-level intensity, the position of pixels, and the arrangement and interrelation among voxel intensities from medical images.8,9 The radiomic features are generally grouped into as conventional, first-order, and second-order features. Since TA has the ability to expose microstructural changes that cannot be noticed by the naked eye, there have been numerous studies that investigated the clinical applicability of it.10–14
There has been no previous data regarding the TA in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. In this study, we focused on the neonates with HIE, and investigated the potential role of MRI-based TA in predicting the severity of brain injury.
Methods
Patient
This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and written parental informed consent was obtained. The neonatology department database was reviewed to identify neonates with perinatal asphyxia and HIE between January 2009 and April 2020. The inclusion criteria were neonates with perinatal asphyxia born at 37 gestational weeks or later and who underwent MRI. 41 neonates were included in the beginning. Neurologic examinations were performed by experienced neonatologists within 6 h of birth, and clinical HIE severity was determined by using the criteria established by the Committee on Fetus and Newborn in 201415 and the modified Sarnat criteria.2 The details of the criteria for defining the perinatal asphyxia were given in the Supplementary Material 1. Patients who underwent MRI examinations after >10 days from birth (n = 3), had severe intracranial hemorrhage that also affected basal ganglia and thalamus (n = 1), and severe congenital malformations or in-born error of metabolism (n = 2) were excluded. After these, 35 neonates with 15 mild HIE and 20 moderate-to-severe HIE were enrolled in this study.
The control group consisted of neonates who had brain MRI in the first 2 weeks of their life for investigating the congenital central nervous system malformation. The neonates with congenital brain malformation or other symptoms (seizures, hypotonia, etc.) that might provoke cerebral damage were not included. According to the consensus of the radiologists, the control group included 33 neonates with normal brain MRI.
MRI protocol
All MRI images were performed by a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner (Gyroscan Achieva, release 8.1; Philips Medical Systems) with a 8-channel head coil. At our institution Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, MRI in neonates is routinely performed without sedation or general anesthesia and preferred during natural sleep. A neonatologist always escorts the patient from transport to the MRI unit to the end of imaging. The infant’s head was immobilized by cushions put around the head during the imaging procedure. The standard MRI protocol was: axial plane images including T1 weighted (T1W) spin-echo (time to repetition [TR]/ time to echo [TE], 532 – 596/15–31 ms), T2 weighted (T2W) turbo spin-echo (TR/TE, 4850 – 5670/100–120 ms), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery turbo spin-echo (TR/TE, 11000/140 ms; inversion time, 2800 ms), and DWI (TR/TE, 3126 – 3476/89 ms; b-value, 1000 s/mm2), and three-dimensional T1W image with sagittal plane (TR/TE, 25/4 ms; flip angle, 30; slice thickness, 1 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed by using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps which were obtained by MRI software was used for ADC images. All axial plane images were done with a slice thickness of 4 mm, an intersection gap of 5 mm, a matrix of 512 × 512, and number of excitations (NEX) of 3. For DWI, number of excitations was 2. The field of view was modified to the size of the neonates' head and ranged from 200 to 220 mm.
Image interpretation
DWI, T1W, and T2W images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists (FCS is a 3-year-experienced pediatric radiologist and OS is a 9-year-experienced radiologist) blinded to clinical data. In cases of the disagreement between the radiologists, a 21-year-experienced pediatric radiologist (HG) evaluated the images. The readers searched for the findings indicating the severe perinatal asphyxia such as a restriction of diffusion in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) on DWI,5,16 increasing signal intensity of the basal ganglia and thalamus on T1W images, and an absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images (absent or present)5,17 (Figure 1). The findings were determined as present if the signal intensity abnormality was observed either unilateral or bilateral. The criteria for image interpretation were presented extendedly in Supplementary Material 1.

A 4-day-old neonate with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. DWI image (a) and ADC map (b) how the restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia (white arrow), thalami (red arrow), and the PLIC (yellow arrow). On axial T1 weighted image (c), the increased signal intensities of the basal ganglia (short arrow) and thalami (long arrow) are seen. Note that the absence of the bright signal of the PLIC. The absence of the hypointense signal of the PLIC on T2 weighted image (d) can be used for the confirmation of the abnormal PLIC signal on T1 weighted image. DWI, diffusion-weighted image; PLIC, posterior limb of the internal capsule.
Texture analysis
Texture features was calculated on two-dimensional sectional images using LifeX software (www.lifexsoft.org).18 The texture features of the basal ganglia and thalami were investigated. Two radiologists (FCS and OS) performed the measurements, independently. Axial plane images on T1W, T2W sequences, and ADC maps were exported in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format from the medical database to LifeX for region of interest (ROI) delineation. The uniformity was provided by adjusting the gray-levels to 128 (7 bits). Intensity rescaling values were conducted automatically between mean ± 3 standard deviations (SDs). Pixels with greater or lesser values than mean ± 3 SDs, in the beginning, were set to mean ± 3 SDs. Lastly, the voxel values in three directions were set as X, 0.7 mm; Y, 0.5 mm; Z, 1 mm after calculating their mean ± 3 SDs. The ROIs for TA of the basal ganglia and thalamus were drawn manually and bilaterally in each sequence on axial two-dimensional images (Figure 2). 47 TA features were measured and calculated for basal ganglia and thalamus, separately. The features were:
- Seven conventional
- Two shape
- Six histogram (HISTO),
- Seven gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM),
- 11 gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM),
- Three neighborhood gray-level different matrix (NGLDM),
- 11 gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM).

Texture analysis was done by ROIs which were placed on the basal ganglia (pink) and thalami (red) on the ADC maps (on top), T2- (on left bottom), and T2 weighted (on right bottom) images. Examples of the histogram plots that were extracted from the ADC maps are seen. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; ROI, region of interest.
All the process was taken approximately 10 min per patient. Further details about the features are presented in Supplementary Material 1.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were made using IBM SPSS v. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Categoric variables were summarized with frequency counts and percentages. The continuous features were summarized with means and standard deviations. Interobserver variability of TA was investigated by intraclass correlation coefficients. The distribution was evaluated and the independent t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used for continuous variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to specify a cut-off value for each statistically significant feature to predict the moderate-to-severe HIE. χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests were used for qualitative MRI features. Independent predictors among the TA features, qualitative MRI features, and clinical findings of moderate-to-severe HIE were assessed with backward stepwise selection procedure of the logistic regression analysis. A p- value lesser than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
Patients
35 neonates with 15 mild and 20 moderate-to-severe HIE and 33 normal neonates were included. No significant differences regarding the gestational age and time from birth to MRI between the normal and HIE groups (p = 0.767; p = 0.062, respectively). The Apgar scores were lower at 1 min and 5 min (p = 0.006; p < 0.001, respectively) and the number of neonates with <5 points of Apgar score at 5 min was higher in moderate-to-severe HIE group (p < 0.001). The rates of hypothermia treatment and endotracheal intubation were also higher in moderate-to-severe HIE group (p < 0.001; p = 0.026, respectively). The details of the clinical features are shown in Table 1.
Mild HIE (n = 15) | Moderate-to-severe HIE (n = 20) | Control (n = 33) | p- value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | ||||
Male Female | 10 (66.7%) 5 (33.3%) | 13 (65%) 7 (35%) | 20 (60.6%) 13 (39.4%) | 1.000 |
Gestational age (week) | 38.2 ± 1.2 | 38.4 ± 1.5 | 38.1 ± 1.6 | 0.856 |
Birth weight (gram) | 3172.4 ± 469.1 | 2926.8 ± 333.7 | 3089.8 ± 428.7 | 0.099 |
Delivery mode | ||||
Spontaneous birth Cesarean section | 5 (33.3%) 10 (66.7%) | 8 (40%) 12 (60%) | 10 (30.3%) 23 (69.7%) | 0.737 |
1 min Apgar scorea | 4 (0–8) | 2 (0–7) | – | 0.006 |
Apgar Score ≤5 at 1 min | 10 (66.7%) | 18 (90%) | – | 0.112 |
5 min Apgar scorea | 6 (4–9) | 4 (1–9) | – | <0.001 |
Apgar Score ≤5 at 5 min | 2 (13.3%) | 17 (85%) | – | <0.001 |
Hypothermia treatment | 2 (13.3%) | 18 (90%) | – | <0.001 |
Resuscitation in the delivery room | 12 (80%) | 19 (95%) | – | 0.292 |
Endotracheal intubation | 11 (73.3%) | 20 (100%) | – | 0.026 |
Time from birth to MRI (day) | 5.6 ± 1.9 | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 8.4 ± 3.3 | 0.419 |
Restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia | 0 (0%) | 8 (40%) | – | 0.006 |
Restricted diffusion in the thalamus | 0 (0%) | 7 (35%) | – | 0.012 |
Restricted diffusion in the PLIC | 1 (6.7%) | 7 (35%) | – | 0.101 |
Increased signal intensity in the basal ganglia on T1W images | 1 (6.7%) | 11 (55%) | – | 0.004 |
Increased signal intensity in the thalamus on T1W images | 0 (0%) | 5 (25%) | – | 0.057 |
Absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images | 1 (6.7%) | 11 (55%) | – | 0.004 |
Radiological features
The MRI findings are presented in Table 1. The restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia and thalamus were significant to indicate the moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.006; p = 0.012, respectively). On T1W images, increased signal intensity in the basal ganglia and absence of the hyperintensity of the PLIC were more common in moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.004; p = 0.004, respectively). Abnormal signal intensities were not observed in the basal ganglia and thalamus on DWI in the mild HIE group.
Texture analysis
The intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver reproducibilities were good to excellent for all texture parameters for basal ganglia and thalami (Online Resource Table 2). The values that were provided by the first author were used for further analysis.
Texture features | ADC-maps | T1-weighted imaging | T2-weighted imaging | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | |
Conventional | ||||||||||||||||||
HU_min HU_mean HU_std HU_max HU_Q1 HU_Q2 HU_Q3 | 458 ± 146 855 ± 265 178 ± 56 1232 ± 39 687 ± 224 878 ± 275 1009 ± 36 | 351 ± 89 618 ± 125 130 ± 46 906 ± 32 491 ± 158 627 ± 154 740 ± 122 | 421 ± 95 712 ± 157 139 ± 50 1003 ± 46 585 ± 183 728 ± 166 831 ± 158 | 0.136 0.095 0.085 0.154 0.063 0.077 0.109 | 0.869 0.700 0.271 0.646 0.533 0.614 0.727 | 0.400 0.419 0.633 0.542 0.458 0.400 0.438 | 135 ± 111 245 ± 155 47 ± 35 340 ± 221 203 ± 120 249 ± 158 283 ± 185 | 194 ± 108 339 ± 199 68 ± 42 486 ± 290 273 ± 167 344 ± 201 394 ± 230 | 195 ± 141 303 ± 200 58 ± 41 423 ± 275 249 ± 167 309 ± 205 353 ± 233 | 0.097 0.171 0.093 0.117 0.261 0.164 0.142 | 0.331 0.741 0.569 0.633 0.826 0.707 0.700 | 0.934 0.610 0.521 0.587 0.705 0.610 0.610 | 282 ± 115 508 ± 184 98 ± 45 694 ± 259 426 ± 146 520 ± 188 593 ± 225 | 399 ± 252 643 ± 224 130 ± 84 906 ± 400 516 ± 254 658 ± 335 757 ± 393 | 463 ± 238 722 ± 373 142 ± 84 989 ± 462 581 ± 288 730 ± 376 850 ± 349 | 0.404 0.868 0.586 0.841 0.991 0.876 0.798 | 0.430 0.727 0.769 0.700 0.741 0.686 0.653 | 0.681 0.681 0.730 0.587 0.681 0.705 0.542 |
Shape | ||||||||||||||||||
SHAPE_Vol(mL) SHAPE_Vol(vx) | 0.5 ± 0.1 1713 ± 40 | 0.5 ± 0.1 1686 ± 56 | 0.4 ± 0.1 1412 ± 67 | 0.625 0.625 | 0.091 0.091 | 0.161 0.172 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1534 ± 44 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1439 ± 47 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1455 ± 64 | 0.578 0.563 | 0.666 0.673 | 0.908 0.908 | 0.5 ± 0.4 1596 ± 12 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1460 ± 64 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1439 ± 64 | 0.621 0.653 | 0.591 0.603 | 0.987 0.987 |
Histogram | ||||||||||||||||||
Skewness Kurtosis Exc. kurtosis Entropy-log10 Entropy-log2 Energy | −0.2 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.8 −0.8 ± 0.8 10.7 ± 0.0 6.5 ± 0.1 0.01 ± 0.0 | –0.1 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.3 –1.1 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.0 5.7 ± 0.2 0.02 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2 –0.9 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.0 6 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.781 0.013 0.013 0.021 0.020 0.087 | 0.003 0.042 0.042 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 | 0.003 0.002 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 | –0.4 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 1.5 −0.0±0.0 1 ± 0.0 6 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.2 2 ± 0.6 –0.9 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.1 5.9 ± 0.3 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 –1.0 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.0 6.1 ± 0.1 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.024 0.003 0.003 0.141 0.154 0.193 | <0.001 0.002 0.002 0.890 0.912 0.633 | 0.028 0.114 0.122 0.014 0.019 0.021 | –0.4 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 1.4 –0.4 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.3 –1.1 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 0.4 0.02 ± 0.0 | –0.1 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2 –1.2 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.0 5.6 ± 0.3 0.02 ± 0.0 | <0.001 0.028 0.028 0.189 0.182 0.087 | 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.104 0.106 0.240 | 0.003 0.479 0.479 0.021 0.019 0.017 |
GLCM | ||||||||||||||||||
Homogeneity Energy Contrast Correlation Entropy-log10 Entropy-log2 Dissimilarity | 0.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 303 ± 11 0.5 ± 0.0 2.7 ± 0.1 8.9 ± 0.5 14.1 ± 3.4 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 411 ± 129 0.4 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 8.4 ± 0.5 16.7 ± 3.5 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 343 ± 89 0.5 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 9.1 ± 0.3 15.5 ± 2.4 | 0.697 0.002 0.005 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.006 | 0.003 0.491 0.259 0.409 0.125 0.140 0.211 | 0.227 <0.001 0.002 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 | 0.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 298 ± 172 0.5 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.1 9 ± 0.6 13.4 ± 5 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 484 ± 325 0.3 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.1 8.8 ± 0.6 17.2 ± 6.7 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 380 ± 277 0.5 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.1 9 ± 0.3 15.2 ± 6.5 | 0.373 0.004 0.021 0.021 0.003 0.003 0.028 | 0.034 0.811 0.212 0.248 0.679 0.653 0.158 | 0.099 0.002 0.069 0.059 0.002 0.002 0.268 | 0.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 365 ± 167 0.4 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 8.8 ± 0.6 15 ± 6.7 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 504 ± 224 0.3 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 8 ± 0.6 18 ± 3.5 | 0.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 368 ± 120 0.4 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 8.4 ± 0.6 15.7 ± 3.5 | 0.001 0.398 0.028 0.030 0.512 0.519 0.021 | 0.790 0.313 0.491 0.588 0.209 0.202 0.409 | 0.004 0.043 0.298 0.268 0.102 0.093 0.268 |
GLRLM | ||||||||||||||||||
SRE LRE LGRE HGRE SRLGE SRHGE LRLGE LRHGE GLNU RLNU RP | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0 4650 ± 19 0.0 ± 0 4466 ± 55 0.0 ± 0.0 5848 ± 37 32.3 ± 11 1462 ± 34 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 4656 ± 33 0.0 ± 0.0 4454 ± 65 0.0 ± 0.0 6300 ± 10 28.3 ± 9 1205 ± 24 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4656 ± 13 0.0 ± 0.0 4495 ± 34 0.0 ± 0.0 5704 ± 28 24.5 ± 6.9 1443 ± 44 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.903 0.746 0.064 0.777 0.422 0.841 0.541 0.697 0.130 0.027 0.920 | 0.011 0.060 0.112 0.134 0.818 0.032 0.042 0.072 0.002 0.720 0.002 | 0.013 0.169 0.633 0.227 0.633 0.080 0.043 0.131 0.169 0.093 0.021 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4627 ± 51 0.0 ± 0.0 4442 ± 78 0.0 ± 0.0 5721 ± 51 28.6 ± 10 1905 ± 73 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4646 ± 26 0.0 ± 0.0 4464 ± 51 0.0 ± 0.0 5743 ± 45 26.4 ± 10 1315 ± 55 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4639 ± 16 0.0 ± 0.0 4500 ± 44 0.0 ± 0.0 5364 ± 27 19.3 ± 8 1174 ± 51 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.894 0.640 0.002 0.017 0.002 0.224 0.007 0.965 0.477 0.002 0.789 | 0.013 0.012 0.050 0.012 0.050 0.001 0.005 0.004 0.007 0.001 0.016 | 0.014 0.005 0.438 0.254 0.657 0.014 0.008 0.004 0.107 0.961 0.015 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 4645 ± 35 0.0 ± 0.0 4413 ± 57 0.0 ± 0.0 6252 ± 12 41.3 ± 22 1787 ± 94 0.93 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4647 ± 17 0.0 ± 0.0 4491 ± 46 0.0 ± 0.0 5540 ± 51 28.7 ± 9 1355 ± 26 0.95 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 4647 ± 35 0.0 ± 0.0 4421 ± 93 0.0 ± 0.0 6076 ± 10 34.8 ± 18 1305 ± 37 0.93 ± 0.0 | 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.470 0.062 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.048 0.189 0.002 | 0.790 0.468 0.027 0.351 0.050 0.646 0.004 0.383 0.373 0.059 0.659 | 0.013 0.039 0.064 0.657 0.780 0.005 0.074 0.016 0.347 0.662 0.016 |
NGLDM | ||||||||||||||||||
Coarseness Contrast Busyness | 0.0 ± 0.0 1 ± 0.0 0.04 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.2 0.04 ± 0.0 | 0.057 0.004 0.001 | 0.081 0.435 0.378 | 0.005 <0.001 0.002 | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.6 0.04 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.8 ± 1.9 0.08 ± 0.0 | 0.01 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.8 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.136 0.016 0.033 | 0.854 0.240 0.378 | 0.149 0.025 0.158 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.9 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 2.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.850 0.097 0.266 | 0.905 0.033 0.160 | 0.755 0.633 0.987 |
GLZLM | ||||||||||||||||||
SZE LZE LGZE HGZE SZLGE SZHGE LZLGE LZHGE GLNU ZLNU ZP | 0.6 ± 0.0 16.3 ± 9.1 0.0 ± 0 5062 ± 25 0.0 ± 0 3270 ± 39 0.02 ± 0.0 65936± 14.2 ± 4.1 250 ± 75 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 31.6 ± 39 0.0 ± 0.0 4938 ± 62 0.0 ± 0.0 3058 ± 49 0.01 ± 0.0 122026± 9.1 ± 3.2 189 ± 109 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 10 ± 5.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4997 ± 16 0.0 ± 0.0 3403 ± 31 0.004 ± 0 42040± 11.2 ± 3 316 ± 123 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.505 0.920 0.764 0.548 0.512 0.286 0.764 0.815 0.010 0.041 0.973 | 0.011 0.040 0.219 0.050 0.028 0.193 0.003 0.023 0.021 0.043 0.004 | 0.013 0.298 0.458 0.587 0.158 0.017 0.298 0.202 0.479 0.003 0.255 | 0.6 ± 0.0 15.2 ± 14 0.0 ± 0.0 4760 ± 42 0.0 ± 0.0 3027 ± 27 0.02 ± 0.0 39784± 15.3 ± 6 383 ± 127 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 14.7 ± 12 0.0 ± 0.0 4982 ± 28 0.00 ± 0.0 3224 ± 40 0.01 ± 0.0 56214± 11.2 ± 4 259 ± 113 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 5.2 ± 3 0.0 ± 0.0 4876 ± 17 0.00 ± 0.0 3680 ± 24 0.00 ± 0.0 20602± 11.3 ± 4.5 381 ± 144 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.903 0.790 0.004 0.017 0.004 0.128 0.586 0.234 0.036 0.053 0.850 | 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.042 0.004 0.005 0.002 0.010 0.033 0.515 0.001 | <0.001 0.001 0.179 0.182 0.036 <0.001 0.001 0.001 0.947 0.013 0.001 | 0.0 ± 0.0 39.5 ± 34 0.0 ± 0.0 4957 ± 34 0.0 ± 0.0 2959 ± 48 0.4 ± 0.0 15,5130 14.6 ± 7 274 ± 158 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 11.6 ± 11 0.0 ± 0.0 5009 ± 19 0.0 ± 0.0 3435 ± 33 0.0 ± 0.0 43333± 13.7 ± 4 329 ± 125 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 45.1 ± 11 0.0 ± 0.0 4993 ± 33 0.0 ± 0.0 3088 ± 49 0.0 ± 0.0 158875± 12.2 ± 3.9 224 ± 111 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.006 0.002 0.097 0.306 0.266 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.868 0.136 0.003 | 0.588 0.414 0.053 0.296 0.163 0.399 0.177 0.425 0.364 0.313 0.557 | 0.071 0.055 0.934 0.868 0.438 0.024 0.080 0.046 0.438 0.013 0.071 |
The comparison of the basal ganglia texture feature values between the groups for each sequence is shown in Table 2. The numbers of the texture features which showed significantly differences between the HIE groups were 21 on the ADC maps, 22 on T1W images, 13 on T1W images. Only texture parameters that had p values lesser than 0.001 between the HIE groups were considered for the diagnostic performances due to the high number of statistically significant texture features. 7 of 21 texture features including 3 HISTO features (entropy log10, entropy log2, and energy), 3 GLCM features (entropy log10, entropy log2, and energy), 1 NGLDM feature (contrast) on the ADC maps and 2 GLZLM features (short-zone emphasis and short-zone high gray-level emphasis) of 22 texture features on T1W images had p values lesser than 0.001.
The comparison of the thalami texture feature values between the groups for each sequence is presented in Table 3. There were 21 significantly different texture features on the ADC maps, 22 on T1W images, and 3 on T2W images between the HIE groups. Among them, 1 GLZLM feature (zone length non-uniformity) on the ADC maps and 1 NGLDM feature (busyness) on T1W images had p values lesser than 0.001.
Texture features | ADC-maps | T1-weighted imaging | T2-weighted imaging | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | Control | Mild HIE | Moderate-to-severe HIE | p- valuea | p- valueb | p- valuec | |
Conventional | ||||||||||||||||||
HU_min HU_mean HU_std HU_max HU_Q1 HU_Q2 HU_Q3 | 562 ± 98 995 ± 15 180 ± 45 1520 ± 29 755 ± 186 978 ± 152 1153 ± 27 | 542 ± 69 915 ± 155 186 ± 35 1361 ± 21548±165 922 ± 143 1039 ± 21 | 526 ± 121 941 ± 190 198 ± 37 1390 ± 30 767 ± 175 965 ± 203 1110 ± 23 | 0.570 0.054 0.929 0.093 0.415 0.036 0.053 | 215 0.551 0.189 0.263 0.259 0.614 0.963 | 0.542 0.419 0.254 0.755 0.458 0.330 0.330 | 135 ± 88 237 ± 134 43 ± 35 334 ± 207 196 ± 101 238 ± 136 273 ± 162 | 172 ± 93 296 ± 180 61 ± 37 422 ± 245 231 ± 148 297 ± 179 350 ± 211 | 186 ± 109 297 ± 167 55 ± 38 414 ± 233 243 ± 132 302 ± 171 346 ± 200 | 0.271 0.322 0.073 0.217 0.714 0.344 0.261 | 0.212 0.202 0.279 0.142 0.236 0.189 0.163 | 0.730 0.961 0.610 0.987 0.657 0.908 0.987 | 267 ± 102 503 ± 178 84 ± 45 700 ± 260 434 ± 145 509 ± 185 575 ± 217 | 351 ± 223 618 ± 339 130 ± 84 906 ± 411 491 ± 322 627 ± 398 740 ± 373 | 421 ± 288 712 ± 467 139 ± 92 991 ± 458 585 ± 285 728 ± 378 831 ± 337 | 0.697 0.798 0.133 0.764 0.938 0.714 0.730 | 0.627 0.693 0.090 0.686 0.707 0.660 0.588 | 0.400 0.419 0.633 0.542 0.458 0.400 0.438 |
Shape | ||||||||||||||||||
SHAPE_Vol(mL) SHAPE_Vol(vx) | 0.5 ± 0.2 1513 ± 40 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1457 ± 56 | 0.5 ± 0.1 1397 ± 67 | 0.903 0.903 | 0.331 0.331 | 0.419 0.419 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1430 ± 26 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1477 ± 27 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1403 ± 24 | 0.609 0.609 | 0.557 0.545 | 0.347 0.330 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1412 ± 12 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1486 ± 64 | 0.5 ± 0.0 1412 ± 64 | 0.917 0.917 | 0.994 0.994 | 0.917 0.917 |
Histogram | ||||||||||||||||||
Skewness Kurtosis Exc. kurtosis Entropy-log10 Entropy-log2 Energy | –0.0 ± 0.2 3 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.0 6 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 –1 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.0 5.9 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.7 –0.8 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.0 6.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | 885 0.085 0.085 0.270 0.243 0.519 | 0.491 0.840 0.847 0.033 0.043 0.004 | 0.298 0.086 0.086 0.011 0.012 0.013 | –0.6 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.6 –0.8 ± 0.0 1.7 ± 0.0 5.8 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.0 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.4 –1.1 ± 0.4 1.73 ± 0.0 5.75 ± 0.2 0.02 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.8 –0.6 ± 0.8 1.81 ± 0.0 6.01 ± 0.2 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0.002 0.050 0.050 0.067 0.083 0.114 | 0.001 0.491 0.491 0.058 0.059 0.043 | 0.099 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.009 | –0.3 ± 0.4 3.5 ± 2.7 0.5 ± 2.7 1.8 ± 0.0 6 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.2 –1.2 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.0 5.7 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 | –0.1 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.6 –1 ± 0.6 1.7 ± 0.0 5.8 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.017 0.014 0.023 | 0.128 0.001 0.001 0.046 0.043 0.202 | 0.021 0.400 0.400 0.402 0.386 0.330 |
GLCM | ||||||||||||||||||
Homogeneity Energy Contrast Correlation Entropy-log10 Entropy-log2 Dissimilarity | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 275 ± 114 0.6 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.2 9.3 ± 0.8 12.9 ± 4.8 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 425 ± 92 0.4 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 8.6 ± 0.4 17.2 ± 1.8 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 343 ± 118 0.5 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 9.2 ± 0.5 15 ± 3.6 | 0.001 0.747 0.025 0.028 0.632 0.632 0.019 | 0.189 0.404 0.142 0.119 0.192 0.192 0.157 | 0.240 0.001 0.023 0.005 0.001 0.001 0.069 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 439 ± 276 0.4 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 8.7 ± 0.6 15.2 ± 5.2 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 537 ± 252 0.2 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1 8.5 ± 0.4 19.1 ± 4.5 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 374 ± 283 0.5 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.1 9 ± 0.6 15.1 ± 6 | 0.234 0.033 0.119 0.035 0.046 0.429 0.011 | 0.073 0.271 0.279 0.620 0.383 0.023 0.840 | 0.380 0.007 0.001 0.001 0.012 0.012 0.005 | 0.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 376 ± 208 0.5 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.2 9.3 ± 0.9 13.6 ± 6.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 497 ± 215 0.3 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.1 8.7 ± 0.6 18.6 ± 3.5 | 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 371 ± 120 0.4 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 8.9 ± 0.4 15.8 ± 3.7 | 0.019 0.062 0.073 0.014 0.077 0.073 0.004 | 0.186 0.364 0.446 0.142 0.192 0.183 0.039 | 0.254 0.330 0.400 0.254 0.289 0.295 0.458 |
GLRLM | ||||||||||||||||||
SRE LRE LGRE HGRE SRLGE SRHGE LRLGE LRHGE GLNU RLNU RP | 0.9 ± 0.0 1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0 4636 ± 33 0.0 ± 0 4463 ± 50 0.0 ± 0.0 5702 ± 37 41.4 ± 10 2113 ± 34 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4652 ± 23 0.0 ± 0.0 4481 ± 34 0.0 ± 0.0 5929 ± 48 22.6 ± 6.8 1110 ± 18 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4641 ± 17 0.0 ± 0.0 4490 ± 85 0.0 ± 0.0 5599 ± 61 27.4 ± 11 1489 ± 72 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.001 0.102 0.051 0.865 0.601 0.002 0.033 0.095 0.002 0.024 0.005 | 0.081 0.927 0.051 0.423 0.202 0.181 0.287 0.978 0.012 0.026 0.225 | 0.036 0.021 0.542 0.254 0.191 0.046 0.114 0.008 0.521 0.014 0.043 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4638 ± 40 0.0 ± 0.0 4438 ± 78 0.0 ± 0.0 5873 ± 79 57.3 ± 50 2633 ± 22 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4655 ± 19 0.0 ± 0.0 4490 ± 28 0.0 ± 0.0 5648 ± 36 29.7 ± 9.9 1218 ± 31 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4636 ± 36 0.0 ± 0.0 4487 ± 54 0.0 ± 0.0 5416 ± 27 22.2 ± 11 1111 ± 53 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.483 0.807 0.001 0.048 0.003 0.030 0.093 0.632 0.136 0.014 0.463 | 0.046 0.048 0.001 0.678 0.006 0.012 0.013 0.064 0.001 0.001 0.061 | 0.096 0.023 0.499 0.069 0.107 0.587 0.131 0.041 0.059 0.419 0.079 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4636 ± 20 0.0 ± 0.0 4457 ± 49 0.0 ± 0.0 5720 ± 60 40 ± 19 2126 ± 12 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4650 ± 22 0.0 ± 0.0 4485 ± 55 0.0 ± 0.0 5652 ± 78 32.1 ± 8 1350 ± 26 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 4638 ± 22 0.0 ± 0.0 4471 ± 70 0.0 ± 0.0 5537 ± 34 28.9 ± 11 1309 ± 38 0.9 ± 0.0 | 0.136 0.225 0.000 0.057 0.001 0.048 0.001 0.221 0.625 0.164 0.112 | 0.225 0.368 0.007 0.455 0.020 0.088 0.001 0.354 0.055 0.052 0.192 | 0.681 0.805 0.030 0.283 0.107 0.681 0.382 0.730 0.367 0.730 0.681 |
NGLDM | ||||||||||||||||||
Coarseness Contrast Busyness | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.2 | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.868 0.022 0.023 | 0.354 0.099 0.527 | 0.107 0.011 0.234 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.1 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.9 ± 1.0 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 1.5 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.065 0.006 0.052 | 0.279 0.720 0.097 | 0.017 0.003 <0.001 | 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.7 ± 1.3 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.001 0.005 0.001 | 0.393 0.054 0.061 | 0.007 0.179 0.122 |
GLZLM | ||||||||||||||||||
SZE LZE LGZE HGZE SZLGE SZHGE LZLGE LZHGE GLNU ZLNU ZP | 0.6 ± 0.0 13.8 ± 7 0.0 ± 0 5043 ± 39 0.0 ± 0 3447 ± 79 0.1 ± 0.0 54193± 17.8 ± 9 472 ± 31 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 16 ± 11 0.0 ± 0.0 5086 ± 27 0.0 ± 0.0 3314 ± 29 0.0 ± 0.0 61060± 9.4 ± 1.9 207 ± 76 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.67 ± 0.0 11 ± 19.5 0.0 ± 0.0 4955 ± 23 0.0 ± 0.0 3467 ± 42 0.0 ± 0.0 51040± 12 ± 4.7 366 ± 156 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.151 0.007 0.681 0.114 0.807 0.697 0.002 0.007 0.051 0.456 0.010 | 0.847 0.317 0.244 0.862 0.326 0.601 0.052 0.425 0.006 0.104 0.503 | 0.006 0.050 0.438 0.135 0.179 0.021 0.080 0.021 0.008 <0.001 0.013 | 0.6 ± 0.0 21.3 ± 22 0.0 ± 0.0 4914 ± 55 0.0 ± 0.0 3351 ± 36 1.6 ± 0.6 152953± 22.2 ± 20 529 ± 127 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.63 ± 0.0 11.7 ± 7 0.00 ± 0.0 5104 ± 26 0.0 ± 0.0 3408 ± 33 0.0 ± 0.0 43552± 12.4 ± 3.5 256 ± 112 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.72 ± 0.1 7.12 ± 6.1 0.0 ± 0.0 4916 ± 27 0.0 ± 0.0 3654 ± 32 0.0 ± 0.0 26520± 11.5 ± 5.1 341 ± 175 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.714 0.463 0.004 0.122 0.007 0.833 0.034 0.398 0.130 0.097 0.947 | 0.001 0.009 0.013 0.993 0.108 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.017 0.755 0.034 | 0.008 0.043 0.069 0.050 0.012 0.013 0.122 0.030 0.547 0.107 0.017 | 0.6 ± 0.0 17.1 ± 23 0.0 ± 0.0 4956 ± 30 0.0 ± 0.0 3259 ± 40 0.2 ± 0.7 68475± 17.3 ± 8.9 461 ± 323 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 17 ± 33.1 0.0 ± 0.0 5014 ± 22 0.0 ± 0.0 3390 ± 37 0.0 ± 0.0 62193± 13.9 ± 3.3 319 ± 145 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 11.3 ± 13 0.0 ± 0.0 4893 ± 24 0.0 ± 0.0 3343 ± 35 0.0 ± 0.0 50008± 13 ± 2.9 302. ± 97 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.221 0.112 0.003 0.697 0.018 0.322 0.006 0.070 0.570 0.436 0.130 | 0.563 0.074 0.036 0.457 0.095 0.653 0.005 0.047 0.219 0.193 0.189 | 0.681 0.831 0.254 0.330 0.479 0.961 0.831 0.908 0.403 0.687 0.694 |
Table 4 presents the ROC curve analyses and diagnostic performances for the texture features that had p values lesser than 0.001 between the HIE groups.
Sequence and texture feature | Area under the curve (95% CI) | Cut-off value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Diagnostic accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basal ganglia | |||||
ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log10 ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log2 ADC map-HISTO_Energy ADC map-GLCM_Energy ADC map-GLCM_Entropy-log10 ADC map-GLCM_Entropy-log2 ADC map-NGLDM_Contrast T1W-GLZLM_SZE T1W-GLZLM_SZHGE | 0.982 (0.946–1.000) 0.989 (0.942–1.000) 0.957 (0.896–1.000) 0.857 (0.717–0.996) 0.877 (0.754–1.000) 0.877 (0.754–0.999) 0.867 (0.722–1.000) 0.855 (0.715–0.995) 0.882 (0.749–1.000) | >1.80 >5.98 <0.0183 <0.0032 >2.63 >8.75 <1.32 >0.668 >3380 | 95 95 95 85 95 95 95 80 95 | 93 93 87 74 74 74 80 87 74 | 94.3 94.3 91.4 80.0 80.0 82.9 88.6 80.0 85.7 |
Thalami | |||||
ADC map-GLZLM_ZLNU T1W-NGLDM_Busyness | 0.868 (0.742–0.994) 0.837 (0.695–0.979) | >274.5 <0.0645 | 85 85 | 80 80 | 82.9 82.9 |
Logistic regression analysis
Binary logistic regression analysis was used to specify the independent predictors for the moderate-to-severe HIE among all texture features that had p values lesser than 0.001. Using a basal ganglia HISTO_entropy log-10 value of higher than 1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value of higher than 5.98 on the ADC maps were found as independent features for predicting the moderate-to-severe HIE (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 266; confidence interval [CI], 15.2–4628.4). The absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images (p = 0.012; OR, 17.11; CI, 1.8–156.2) was found as an independent finding among the radiological features.
Table 5 and Figure 3 summarize the comparison of the diagnostic performances of the independent predictors and their combination. Using only a basal ganglia HISTO_entropy log-10 value of higher than 1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value of higher than 5.98 on the ADC maps had equally diagnostic yields when compared to its' combination with the absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images.

ROC curves of using HISTO_entropy log 10 cut-off value and predictive models that were created by the combination of the HISTO_entropy log 10 value, other texture features, and absence of the hyperintense PLIC on T1 weighted images. The cut-off values obtained from the ADC maps were used for HISTO_Entropy-log10, GLCM_entropy log 2, NGLDM_contrast, and GLZLM_ZLNU. The cut-off value obtained from the T1 weighted images was used for NGLDM_busyness. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; GLZLM, gray-level zone length matrix; HISTO, histogram; NGLDM, neighborhood gray-level difference matrix; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ZLNU, zone length non-uniformity
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log10b | 95 (73.0–99.7) | 93.3 (66.0–99.6) | 95 | 93.3 | 94.3 |
Absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1 weighted images | 55 (32.0–76.1) | 93.3 (66.0–99.6) | 91.6 | 60.8 | 71.4 |
The combined-modelc | 95 (73–99.7) | 93.3 (66–99.6) | 95 | 93.3 | 94.3 |
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that MRI-based TA of the basal ganglia and thalami allows for accurate diagnosis of moderate-to-severe HIE in neonates. We found that using only a HISTO_entropy log-10 value as >1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value as >5.98 that were obtained from the basal ganglia on the ADC maps had an exquisite diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 93.3, and a diagnostic accuracy of 94.3. The combined-models that were used together with the HISTO_entropy log-10 cutoff value, either the radiological findings or other significant texture parameters, had not significant contributions for the differentiation of moderate-to-severe HIE from mild HIE when compared to using HISTO_entropy log-10 alone. We also demonstrated that several texture parameters from basal ganglia and thalami had high diagnostic accuracy for predicting the severity of HIE. Besides these, we presented the texture feature values of the basal ganglia and thalami in normal neonates with comparisons of those of HIE groups.
Although conventional and further techniques of brain MRI findings in neonates with HIE have been described,1,5,17,19–25 to our best knowledge, this is the first article that evaluated the diagnostic yield of TA for differentiating moderate-to-severe HIE from mild HIE. In 2019, Weiss et al26 proclaimed that they will work on a study protocol including radiomics that will provide MRI‐based HIE lesion detection and outcome prediction. However, their results have not been published yet. Apart from this, Kim et al27 investigated the feasibility of the deep medullary veins TA in infants with developmental and ischemic injury. The authors performed their study by only using first-order histogram analysis and including very few infants. Despite several technical and methodologic differences when compared to our study, they also reported that the texture features can potentially be used as quantitative markers for differentiating infants with ischemic injury through deep medullary vein changes.
A series of quantitative imaging features can be extracted from MRI-based TA. The first-order statistical feature, also called the histogram, is the distribution of voxel intensities within the ROI by various basic features, such as skewness, kurtosis, entropy, and energy of gray level intensity. Entropy is defined as randomness and a measure of the amount of uncertainty in a source.28 Although it is not possible to interpret precisely, we can claim that a larger value of entropy may indicate a stronger heterogeneity of intensity values since higher results than threshold value point out the moderate-to-severe HIE according to our findings. In addition to the excellent diagnostic performance of the HISTO_entropy values, second-order features including GLCM, NGLDM, and GLZLM values, which describe the statistical relationships between pixels or voxels, were also found as notably useful texture parameters for discriminating between the mild and moderate-to-severe HIE in this study. Considering the diagnostic utility of the features as well as the short application time, we believe that MRI-based radiomics may be used as a diagnostic tool in daily practice.
According to our results, there were several statistically significant texture parameters between the normal neonates and mild HIE and moderate-to-severe HIE. Although, the deep gray matter injury does not an expected finding in the mild hypoxic injury,5 we could speculate that TA might show the imperceptible findings in the deep gray matter on conventional MRI.
Although the involvement of the basal ganglia and thalamus usually occurs in the setting of the moderate-to-severe hypoxic injury, the detection of the signal abnormalities is highly related to the timing of the imaging. There was no difference regarding to the time from birth to MRI between the mild (5.6 days) and moderate-to-severe HIE (5.9 days) groups (p = 0.419). Imai et al29 investigated the early (1–3 days) and late (4–7 days) MRI changes in the thalamus and basal ganglia in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. They reported that ADC values were lower in the thalami in the early period while the values were lower in the basal ganglia in the late period. Although we found significant thalamic texture feature values in the ADC maps for differentiating the groups, the area under curve results, the significance of values, and the number of significant parameters were superior for the basal ganglia measurements. It may be related to the mean time of the imaging in our study group.
Considering the radiological findings, an absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images was found as an independent predictor the moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.012). Due to the high specificity value (93.3%) of this finding, we can comment that the high signal intensity in the PLIC on T1W images indicates to the mild HIE in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Although the finding was found as an independent predictor, the diagnostic accuracy (71.4%) was not substantial, especially compared with the values of TA (93.3%).
Liauw et al25 reported the combination of T1W, T2W, and DWI as the best for detecting cerebral damage in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. T2W images are also usually used for a confirmation of the signal intensity abnormalities which are detected on T1W images.5 We used these three sequences in TA for two main reasons. First and foremost, we can gain substantial information from TA which is not detected on visual inspection. The second reason was that we did not want to overlook the contributes of the sequences since the best time for the depiction of the brain damage varies in each sequence.4,5,20
In terms of the utility of the radiomic features, new studies have been adding to the literature continuously. There are a few studies in the literature on the use of basal ganglia TA features in different diseases.30,31 Johns et al30 found that the basal ganglia texture features significantly differ in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In another study, it is suggested that the basal ganglia TA can be used for evaluating the blood-brain integrity in small vessel disease.31 This is the first study which presented the diagnostic role of the MRI-based TA to predict the severity of hypoxic injury in neonates with asphyxia. We investigated the texture features in both basal ganglia and thalami on DWI, T1W, and T2W images to reveal the microchanges in hypoxic injury. Also, we included the control group to demonstrate the normal texture features values and to reveal microstructural changes in neonates with asphyxia with normal-appearanced brain MRI. These are the major strengths of this study.
Our study had several limitations. First, the study had a retrospective design and the study sample was small. Second, the ROIs of the basal ganglia and thalami were selected on axial images as two-dimensional. Neonates have fewer slice numbers due to their relatively smaller field of view. We thought that it was not ideal to delineate the ROI in multiple slices especially in the ADC maps. Third, although radiological findings and metabolite values on MRI-spectroscopy could be changed after the hypothermia treatment,32,33 we did not exclude the neonates who underwent hypothermia treatment since it was one of the routine procedures for severe perinatal asphyxia in many centers. Fourth, as it is known, various imaging protocols may potentially affect the TA. To handle this issue, we used preprocessing steps to normalize the voxel sizes and homogenize the pixel discretization. However, the variety of some of the imaging parameters that could not be normalized, such as TR and TE values of the sequences, might be one of the limitations of this work. There could be more reliable results with using the same imaging protocols for all patients. In addition to this, the timing of imaging, which is an important determinant of radiological findings in patients with HIE, may also have an effect on the TA. So, further studies with different protocols are needed to verify the reproducibility and feasibility of our results. Fifth, cerebral cortex, which is one of the affected areas in severe perinatal asphyxia,34 was not considered in TA since we thought that the discrimination of the ROI in the cortical gray matter would not be reliable. Sixth, the low TR values may have negatively affected the optimization of signal-noise ratio to achieve good gray-white matter differentiation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our results suggest that using only HISTO_entropy values of the basal ganglia on the ADC maps allows for accurate diagnosis of the moderate-to-severe HIE in neonates. TA may generate objective features that are able to indicate differences in the basal ganglia and thalami, even if there is no visually detectable difference, in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Although implementing tools for TA is relatively simple and can be applied for many imaging techniques, further studies are needed until these methods can be used reliably in clinical practice.
REFERENCES
1. . Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361: 736–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12658-X
2. . Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 696–705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012
3. . Assessment of brain tissue injury after moderate hypothermia in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a nested substudy of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 39–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70295-9
4. . MR imaging of hypoxic-ischemic injury in term neonates: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 2014; 34: 1047–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.344130080
5. . Imaging findings in neonatal hypoxia: a practical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 41–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1321
6. . Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: correlation of serial mri and outcome. Pediatr Neurol 2004; 31: 267–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.04.011
7. . Clinical and mri correlates of cerebral palsy: the european cerebral palsy study. JAMA 4, 2006; 296: 1602–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.13.1602
8. . Texture analysis of imaging: what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212: 520–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20624
9. . Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur Radiol Exp 14, 2018; 2: 36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0068-z
10. . MRI-based texture analysis to differentiate the most common parotid tumours. Clin Radiol 2020; 75: 877. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.018
11. . A radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitis b virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018; 24: 121–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17467
12. . MR texture analysis in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma. Br J Radiol 2020; 93(1114):
20200569 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.2020056913. . MRI-based texture analysis for differentiating pediatric craniofacial rhabdomyosarcoma from infantile hemangioma. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 5227–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06908-4
14. . Texture analysis of 18f-fdg pet/ct for grading thymic epithelial tumours: usefulness of combining suv and texture parameters. Br J Radiol 2018; 91(1083):
20170546 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.2017054615.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Papile L-A, Baley JE, Benitz W, Cummings J, Carlo WA, . Hypothermia and neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2014; 133: 1146–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-089916. . Neonatal ischemic brain injury: what every radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol 2012; 42: 606–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2332-8
17. . Differentiating normal myelination from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy on t1-weighted mr images: a new approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 660–65.
18. . LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 2018; 78: 4786–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0125
19. . Magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of brain injury after moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18: 35–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30325-9
20. . MR imaging, mr spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuradiol 2006; 27: 533–47.
21. . Use of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair) pulse sequences in perinatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 282–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.71.843.9616237
22. . Diffusion-weighted and conventional mr imaging in neonatal hypoxic ischemia: two-year follow-up study. Radiology 2008; 249: 631–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492071581
23. . Early identification of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy by combination of magnetic resonance (mr) imaging and proton mr spectroscopy. Exp Ther Med 2016; 12: 2835–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3740
24. . The role of diffusion tensor imaging in detecting hippocampal injury following neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Neuroimaging 2019; 29: 252–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12572
25. . Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: diagnostic value of conventional mr imaging pulse sequences in term-born neonates. Radiology 2008; 247: 204–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2471070812
26. . Mining multi-site clinical data to develop machine learning mri biomarkers: application to neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. J Transl Med 21, 2019; 17(1):
385 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-2119-527. . Texture analysis of deep medullary veins on susceptibility-weighted imaging in infants: evaluating developmental and ischemic changes. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 2594–2603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06618-6
28. . Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 187–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/42.563664
29. . MRI changes in the thalamus and basal ganglia of full-term neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Neonatology 2018; 114: 253–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000489159
30. . Quantifying changes on susceptibility weighted images in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using mri texture analysis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2019; 20: 396–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2019.1599024
31. . Application of texture analysis to study small vessel disease and blood-brain barrier integrity. Front Neurol 2017; 8:
327 . doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.0032732. . Early proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy during and after therapeutic hypothermia in perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Radiol 2019; 49: 941–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04383-8
33. . Newborns referred for therapeutic hypothermia: association between initial degree of encephalopathy and severity of brain injury (what about the newborns with mild encephalopathy on admission?). Am J Perinatol 2016; 33: 195–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1563712
34. . Term neonate prognoses after perinatal asphyxia: contributions of mr imaging, mr spectroscopy, relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology 2006; 239: 839–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2393050027