Skip to main content
Free AccessFull Paper

The role of MRI-based texture analysis to predict the severity of brain injury in neonates with perinatal asphyxia

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210128

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of the MRI-based texture analysis (TA) of the basal ganglia and thalami to distinguish moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from mild HIE in neonates.

Methods:

This study included 68 neonates (15 with mild, 20 with moderate-to-severe HIE, and 33 control) were born at 37 gestational weeks or later and underwent MRI in first 10 days after birth. The basal ganglia and thalami were delineated for TA on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, T1-, and T2 weighted images. The basal ganglia, thalami, and the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) were also evaluated visually on diffusion-weighted imaging and T1 weighted sequence. Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analyses were used.

Results:

Totally, 56 texture features for the basal ganglia and 46 features for the thalami were significantly different between the HIE groups on the ADC maps, T2-, and T2 weighted sequences. Using a Histogram_entropy log-10 value as >1.8 from the basal ganglia on the ADC maps (p < 0.001; OR, 266) and the absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1 weighted images (p = 0.012; OR, 17.11) were found as independent predictors for moderate-to-severe HIE. Using only a Histogram_entropy log-10 value had an equal diagnostic yield when compared to its combination with other texture features and imaging findings.

Conclusion:

The Histogram_entropy log-10 value can be used as an indicator to differentiate from moderate-to-severe to mild HIE.

Advances in knowledge:

MRI-based TA may provide quantitative findings to indicate different stages in neonates with perinatal asphyxia.

Introduction

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the most devastating results of perinatal asphyxia.1 Sarnat score is most commonly used clinical scoring system for evaluating the severity of neonatal HIE. Patients are classified as mild (Stage 1), moderate (Stage 2), and severe (Stage 3) HIE according to the Sarnat criteria, which is based on the clinical signs and electroencephalographic results.2 Determining the severity of brain injury and staging of HIE is crucial, as it plays an important role in establishing neuroprotective therapeutic options and predicting long-term outcome.3

The imaging patterns of hypoxic injury vary depending on the severity and duration of insult, gestational age, and the timing of imaging. MRI is the best modality for evaluating suspected HIE.4 Abnormal signal intensities can be usually detected in basal ganglia and thalamus, which are known as the vulnerable sites to oxidative stress, in neonates with severe HIE.4,5 However, it is reported that neurologic deficits may also occur in some neonates with normal brain MRI findings.6,7

Although MRI is an indispensable imaging modality for various clinical situations, it can provide limited information that is based on human eye perception. Furthermore, unmyelinated brain structure with high-water content in newborns makes the discrimination of the pathologic signal and the evaluation of brain MRI more difficult. Recently, texture analysis (TA) as a radiomic approach has been widely used for non-invasive quantitative evaluation of different pathological conditions. TA allows extracting the data of gray-level intensity, the position of pixels, and the arrangement and interrelation among voxel intensities from medical images.8,9 The radiomic features are generally grouped into as conventional, first-order, and second-order features. Since TA has the ability to expose microstructural changes that cannot be noticed by the naked eye, there have been numerous studies that investigated the clinical applicability of it.10–14

There has been no previous data regarding the TA in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. In this study, we focused on the neonates with HIE, and investigated the potential role of MRI-based TA in predicting the severity of brain injury.

Methods

Patient

This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and written parental informed consent was obtained. The neonatology department database was reviewed to identify neonates with perinatal asphyxia and HIE between January 2009 and April 2020. The inclusion criteria were neonates with perinatal asphyxia born at 37 gestational weeks or later and who underwent MRI. 41 neonates were included in the beginning. Neurologic examinations were performed by experienced neonatologists within 6 h of birth, and clinical HIE severity was determined by using the criteria established by the Committee on Fetus and Newborn in 201415 and the modified Sarnat criteria.2 The details of the criteria for defining the perinatal asphyxia were given in the Supplementary Material 1. Patients who underwent MRI examinations after >10 days from birth (n = 3), had severe intracranial hemorrhage that also affected basal ganglia and thalamus (n = 1), and severe congenital malformations or in-born error of metabolism (n = 2) were excluded. After these, 35 neonates with 15 mild HIE and 20 moderate-to-severe HIE were enrolled in this study.

The control group consisted of neonates who had brain MRI in the first 2 weeks of their life for investigating the congenital central nervous system malformation. The neonates with congenital brain malformation or other symptoms (seizures, hypotonia, etc.) that might provoke cerebral damage were not included. According to the consensus of the radiologists, the control group included 33 neonates with normal brain MRI.

MRI protocol

All MRI images were performed by a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner (Gyroscan Achieva, release 8.1; Philips Medical Systems) with a 8-channel head coil. At our institution Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, MRI in neonates is routinely performed without sedation or general anesthesia and preferred during natural sleep. A neonatologist always escorts the patient from transport to the MRI unit to the end of imaging. The infant’s head was immobilized by cushions put around the head during the imaging procedure. The standard MRI protocol was: axial plane images including T1 weighted (T1W) spin-echo (time to repetition [TR]/ time to echo [TE], 532 – 596/15–31 ms), T2 weighted (T2W) turbo spin-echo (TR/TE, 4850 – 5670/100–120 ms), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery turbo spin-echo (TR/TE, 11000/140 ms; inversion time, 2800 ms), and DWI (TR/TE, 3126 – 3476/89 ms; b-value, 1000 s/mm2), and three-dimensional T1W image with sagittal plane (TR/TE, 25/4 ms; flip angle, 30; slice thickness, 1 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed by using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps which were obtained by MRI software was used for ADC images. All axial plane images were done with a slice thickness of 4 mm, an intersection gap of 5 mm, a matrix of 512 × 512, and number of excitations (NEX) of 3. For DWI, number of excitations was 2. The field of view was modified to the size of the neonates' head and ranged from 200 to 220 mm.

Image interpretation

DWI, T1W, and T2W images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists (FCS is a 3-year-experienced pediatric radiologist and OS is a 9-year-experienced radiologist) blinded to clinical data. In cases of the disagreement between the radiologists, a 21-year-experienced pediatric radiologist (HG) evaluated the images. The readers searched for the findings indicating the severe perinatal asphyxia such as a restriction of diffusion in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) on DWI,5,16 increasing signal intensity of the basal ganglia and thalamus on T1W images, and an absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images (absent or present)5,17 (Figure 1). The findings were determined as present if the signal intensity abnormality was observed either unilateral or bilateral. The criteria for image interpretation were presented extendedly in Supplementary Material 1.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

A 4-day-old neonate with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. DWI image (a) and ADC map (b) how the restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia (white arrow), thalami (red arrow), and the PLIC (yellow arrow). On axial T1 weighted image (c), the increased signal intensities of the basal ganglia (short arrow) and thalami (long arrow) are seen. Note that the absence of the bright signal of the PLIC. The absence of the hypointense signal of the PLIC on T2 weighted image (d) can be used for the confirmation of the abnormal PLIC signal on T1 weighted image. DWI, diffusion-weighted image; PLIC, posterior limb of the internal capsule.

Texture analysis

Texture features was calculated on two-dimensional sectional images using LifeX software (www.lifexsoft.org).18 The texture features of the basal ganglia and thalami were investigated. Two radiologists (FCS and OS) performed the measurements, independently. Axial plane images on T1W, T2W sequences, and ADC maps were exported in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format from the medical database to LifeX for region of interest (ROI) delineation. The uniformity was provided by adjusting the gray-levels to 128 (7 bits). Intensity rescaling values were conducted automatically between mean ± 3 standard deviations (SDs). Pixels with greater or lesser values than mean ± 3 SDs, in the beginning, were set to mean ± 3 SDs. Lastly, the voxel values in three directions were set as X, 0.7 mm; Y, 0.5 mm; Z, 1 mm after calculating their mean ± 3 SDs. The ROIs for TA of the basal ganglia and thalamus were drawn manually and bilaterally in each sequence on axial two-dimensional images (Figure 2). 47 TA features were measured and calculated for basal ganglia and thalamus, separately. The features were:

  • Seven conventional
  • Two shape
  • Six histogram (HISTO),
  • Seven gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM),
  • 11 gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM),
  • Three neighborhood gray-level different matrix (NGLDM),
  • 11 gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Texture analysis was done by ROIs which were placed on the basal ganglia (pink) and thalami (red) on the ADC maps (on top), T2- (on left bottom), and T2 weighted (on right bottom) images. Examples of the histogram plots that were extracted from the ADC maps are seen. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; ROI, region of interest.

All the process was taken approximately 10 min per patient. Further details about the features are presented in Supplementary Material 1.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were made using IBM SPSS v. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Categoric variables were summarized with frequency counts and percentages. The continuous features were summarized with means and standard deviations. Interobserver variability of TA was investigated by intraclass correlation coefficients. The distribution was evaluated and the independent t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used for continuous variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to specify a cut-off value for each statistically significant feature to predict the moderate-to-severe HIE. χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests were used for qualitative MRI features. Independent predictors among the TA features, qualitative MRI features, and clinical findings of moderate-to-severe HIE were assessed with backward stepwise selection procedure of the logistic regression analysis. A p- value lesser than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Patients

35 neonates with 15 mild and 20 moderate-to-severe HIE and 33 normal neonates were included. No significant differences regarding the gestational age and time from birth to MRI between the normal and HIE groups (p = 0.767; p = 0.062, respectively). The Apgar scores were lower at 1 min and 5 min (p = 0.006; p < 0.001, respectively) and the number of neonates with <5 points of Apgar score at 5 min was higher in moderate-to-severe HIE group (p < 0.001). The rates of hypothermia treatment and endotracheal intubation were also higher in moderate-to-severe HIE group (p < 0.001; p = 0.026, respectively). The details of the clinical features are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Clinical features and conventional MRI findings of the HIE and control groups

Mild HIE (n = 15)Moderate-to-severe HIE (n = 20)Control
(n = 33)
p- value
Sex
Male
Female
10 (66.7%)
5 (33.3%)
13 (65%)
7 (35%)
20 (60.6%)
13 (39.4%)
1.000
Gestational age (week)38.2 ± 1.238.4 ± 1.538.1 ± 1.60.856
Birth weight (gram)3172.4 ± 469.12926.8 ± 333.73089.8 ± 428.70.099
Delivery mode
Spontaneous birth
Cesarean section
5 (33.3%)
10 (66.7%)
8 (40%)
12 (60%)
10 (30.3%)
23 (69.7%)
0.737
1 min Apgar scorea4 (0–8)2 (0–7)0.006
Apgar Score ≤5 at 1 min10 (66.7%)18 (90%)0.112
5 min Apgar scorea6 (4–9)4 (1–9)<0.001
Apgar Score ≤5 at 5 min2 (13.3%)17 (85%)<0.001
Hypothermia treatment2 (13.3%)18 (90%)<0.001
Resuscitation in the delivery room12 (80%)19 (95%)0.292
Endotracheal intubation11 (73.3%)20 (100%)0.026
Time from birth to MRI (day)5.6 ± 1.95.9 ± 1.58.4 ± 3.30.419
Restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia0 (0%)8 (40%)0.006
Restricted diffusion in the thalamus0 (0%)7 (35%)0.012
Restricted diffusion in the PLIC1 (6.7%)7 (35%)0.101
Increased signal intensity in the basal ganglia on T1W images1 (6.7%)11 (55%)0.004
Increased signal intensity in the thalamus on T1W images0 (0%)5 (25%)0.057
Absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images1 (6.7%)11 (55%)0.004

HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy;PLIC, the posterior limb of the internal capsule;T1W, T1 weighted.

Bold values mean statistically significant.

p-values indicate the comparison between the mild and moderate-to-severe HIE groups.

aNumbers in parentheses are ranges.

Radiological features

The MRI findings are presented in Table 1. The restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia and thalamus were significant to indicate the moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.006; p = 0.012, respectively). On T1W images, increased signal intensity in the basal ganglia and absence of the hyperintensity of the PLIC were more common in moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.004; p = 0.004, respectively). Abnormal signal intensities were not observed in the basal ganglia and thalamus on DWI in the mild HIE group.

Texture analysis

The intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver reproducibilities were good to excellent for all texture parameters for basal ganglia and thalami (Online Resource Table 2). The values that were provided by the first author were used for further analysis.

Table 2. Comparison of the texture feature values of the basal ganglia between the groups

Texture featuresADC-mapsT1-weighted imagingT2-weighted imaging
ControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuecControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuecControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuec
Conventional
HU_min
HU_mean
HU_std
HU_max
HU_Q1
HU_Q2
HU_Q3
458 ± 146
855 ± 265
178 ± 56
1232 ± 39
687 ± 224
878 ± 275
1009 ± 36
351 ± 89
618 ± 125
130 ± 46
906 ± 32
491 ± 158
627 ± 154
740 ± 122
421 ± 95
712 ± 157
139 ± 50
1003 ± 46
585 ± 183
728 ± 166
831 ± 158
0.136
0.095
0.085
0.154
0.063
0.077
0.109
0.869
0.700
0.271
0.646
0.533
0.614
0.727
0.400
0.419
0.633
0.542
0.458
0.400
0.438
135 ± 111
245 ± 155
47 ± 35
340 ± 221
203 ± 120
249 ± 158
283 ± 185
194 ± 108
339 ± 199
68 ± 42
486 ± 290
273 ± 167
344 ± 201
394 ± 230
195 ± 141
303 ± 200
58 ± 41
423 ± 275
249 ± 167
309 ± 205
353 ± 233
0.097
0.171
0.093
0.117
0.261
0.164
0.142
0.331
0.741
0.569
0.633
0.826
0.707
0.700
0.934
0.610
0.521
0.587
0.705
0.610
0.610
282 ± 115
508 ± 184
98 ± 45
694 ± 259
426 ± 146
520 ± 188
593 ± 225
399 ± 252
643 ± 224
130 ± 84
906 ± 400
516 ± 254
658 ± 335
757 ± 393
463 ± 238
722 ± 373
142 ± 84
989 ± 462
581 ± 288
730 ± 376
850 ± 349
0.404
0.868
0.586
0.841
0.991
0.876
0.798
0.430
0.727
0.769
0.700
0.741
0.686
0.653
0.681
0.681
0.730
0.587
0.681
0.705
0.542
Shape
SHAPE_Vol(mL)
SHAPE_Vol(vx)
0.5 ± 0.1
1713 ± 40
0.5 ± 0.1
1686 ± 56
0.4 ± 0.1
1412 ± 67
0.625
0.625
0.091
0.091
0.161
0.172
0.5 ± 0.0
1534 ± 44
0.5 ± 0.0
1439 ± 47
0.5 ± 0.0
1455 ± 64
0.578
0.563
0.666
0.673
0.908
0.908
0.5 ± 0.4
1596 ± 12
0.5 ± 0.0
1460 ± 64
0.5 ± 0.0
1439 ± 64
0.621
0.653
0.591
0.603
0.987
0.987
Histogram
Skewness
Kurtosis
Exc. kurtosis
Entropy-log10
Entropy-log2
Energy
−0.2 ± 0.4
2.3 ± 0.8
−0.8 ± 0.8
10.7 ± 0.0
6.5 ± 0.1
0.01 ± 0.0
–0.1 ± 0.2
1.8 ± 0.3
–1.1 ± 0.3
1.7 ± 0.0
5.7 ± 0.2
0.02 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.1
2.0 ± 0.2
–0.9 ± 0.2
1.8 ± 0.0
6 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
0.781
0.013
0.013
0.021
0.020
0.087
0.003
0.042
0.042
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.003
0.002
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
–0.4 ± 0.1
2.9 ± 1.5
−0.0±0.0
1 ± 0.0
6 ± 0.6
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.2
2 ± 0.6
–0.9 ± 0.6
1.7 ± 0.1
5.9 ± 0.3
0.01 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.1
1.9 ± 0.2
–1.0 ± 0.2
1.5 ± 0.0
6.1 ± 0.1
0.01 ± 0.0
0.024
0.003
0.003
0.141
0.154
0.193
<0.001
0.002
0.002
0.890
0.912
0.633
0.028
0.114
0.122
0.014
0.019
0.021
–0.4 ± 0.5
2.5 ± 1.4
–0.4 ± 0.1
1.7 ± 0.8
5.7 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.1
1.8 ± 0.3
–1.1 ± 0.3
1.7 ± 0.1
5.8 ± 0.4
0.02 ± 0.0
–0.1 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.2
–1.2 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.0
5.6 ± 0.3
0.02 ± 0.0
<0.001
0.028
0.028
0.189
0.182
0.087
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.104
0.106
0.240
0.003
0.479
0.479
0.021
0.019
0.017
GLCM
Homogeneity
Energy
Contrast
Correlation
Entropy-log10
Entropy-log2
Dissimilarity
0.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
303 ± 11
0.5 ± 0.0
2.7 ± 0.1
8.9 ± 0.5
14.1 ± 3.4
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
411 ± 129
0.4 ± 0.1
2.5 ± 0.1
8.4 ± 0.5
16.7 ± 3.5
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
343 ± 89
0.5 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
9.1 ± 0.3
15.5 ± 2.4
0.697
0.002
0.005
0.011
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.491
0.259
0.409
0.125
0.140
0.211
0.227
<0.001
0.002
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
0.003
0.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
298 ± 172
0.5 ± 0.2
2.8 ± 0.1
9 ± 0.6
13.4 ± 5
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
484 ± 325
0.3 ± 0.3
2.6 ± 0.1
8.8 ± 0.6
17.2 ± 6.7
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
380 ± 277
0.5 ± 0.3
2.7 ± 0.1
9 ± 0.3
15.2 ± 6.5
0.373
0.004
0.021
0.021
0.003
0.003
0.028
0.034
0.811
0.212
0.248
0.679
0.653
0.158
0.099
0.002
0.069
0.059
0.002
0.002
0.268
0.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
365 ± 167
0.4 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.1
8.8 ± 0.6
15 ± 6.7
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
504 ± 224
0.3 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.2
8 ± 0.6
18 ± 3.5
0.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
368 ± 120
0.4 ± 0.1
2.5 ± 0.1
8.4 ± 0.6
15.7 ± 3.5
0.001
0.398
0.028
0.030
0.512
0.519
0.021
0.790
0.313
0.491
0.588
0.209
0.202
0.409
0.004
0.043
0.298
0.268
0.102
0.093
0.268
GLRLM
SRE
LRE
LGRE
HGRE
SRLGE
SRHGE
LRLGE
LRHGE
GLNU
RLNU
RP
0.9 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0
4650 ± 19
0.0 ± 0
4466 ± 55
0.0 ± 0.0
5848 ± 37
32.3 ± 11
1462 ± 34
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
4656 ± 33
0.0 ± 0.0
4454 ± 65
0.0 ± 0.0
6300 ± 10
28.3 ± 9
1205 ± 24
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4656 ± 13
0.0 ± 0.0
4495 ± 34
0.0 ± 0.0
5704 ± 28
24.5 ± 6.9
1443 ± 44
0.9 ± 0.0
0.903
0.746
0.064
0.777
0.422
0.841
0.541
0.697
0.130
0.027
0.920
0.011
0.060
0.112
0.134
0.818
0.032
0.042
0.072
0.002
0.720
0.002
0.013
0.169
0.633
0.227
0.633
0.080
0.043
0.131
0.169
0.093
0.021
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4627 ± 51
0.0 ± 0.0
4442 ± 78
0.0 ± 0.0
5721 ± 51
28.6 ± 10
1905 ± 73
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4646 ± 26
0.0 ± 0.0
4464 ± 51
0.0 ± 0.0
5743 ± 45
26.4 ± 10
1315 ± 55
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4639 ± 16
0.0 ± 0.0
4500 ± 44
0.0 ± 0.0
5364 ± 27
19.3 ± 8
1174 ± 51
0.9 ± 0.0
0.894
0.640
0.002
0.017
0.002
0.224
0.007
0.965
0.477
0.002
0.789
0.013
0.012
0.050
0.012
0.050
0.001
0.005
0.004
0.007
0.001
0.016
0.014
0.005
0.438
0.254
0.657
0.014
0.008
0.004
0.107
0.961
0.015
0.9 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
4645 ± 35
0.0 ± 0.0
4413 ± 57
0.0 ± 0.0
6252 ± 12
41.3 ± 22
1787 ± 94
0.93 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4647 ± 17
0.0 ± 0.0
4491 ± 46
0.0 ± 0.0
5540 ± 51
28.7 ± 9
1355 ± 26
0.95 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
4647 ± 35
0.0 ± 0.0
4421 ± 93
0.0 ± 0.0
6076 ± 10
34.8 ± 18
1305 ± 37
0.93 ± 0.0
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.470
0.062
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.048
0.189
0.002
0.790
0.468
0.027
0.351
0.050
0.646
0.004
0.383
0.373
0.059
0.659
0.013
0.039
0.064
0.657
0.780
0.005
0.074
0.016
0.347
0.662
0.016
NGLDM
Coarseness
Contrast
Busyness
0.0 ± 0.0
1 ± 0.0
0.04 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1 ± 0.6
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.2
0.04 ± 0.0
0.057
0.004
0.001
0.081
0.435
0.378
0.005
<0.001
0.002
0.0 ± 0.0
0.8 ± 0.6
0.04 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.8 ± 1.9
0.08 ± 0.0
0.01 ± 0.0
1.0 ± 0.8
0.05 ± 0.0
0.136
0.016
0.033
0.854
0.240
0.378
0.149
0.025
0.158
0.0 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.9
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
2.1 ± 2.2
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.7 ± 0.6
0.0 ± 0.0
0.850
0.097
0.266
0.905
0.033
0.160
0.755
0.633
0.987
GLZLM
SZE
LZE
LGZE
HGZE
SZLGE
SZHGE
LZLGE
LZHGE
GLNU
ZLNU
ZP
0.6 ± 0.0
16.3 ± 9.1
0.0 ± 0
5062 ± 25
0.0 ± 0
3270 ± 39
0.02 ± 0.0
65936±
14.2 ± 4.1
250 ± 75
0.4 ± 0.0
0.5 ± 0.1
31.6 ± 39
0.0 ± 0.0
4938 ± 62
0.0 ± 0.0
3058 ± 49
0.01 ± 0.0
122026±
9.1 ± 3.2
189 ± 109
0.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.0
10 ± 5.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4997 ± 16
0.0 ± 0.0
3403 ± 31
0.004 ± 0
42040±
11.2 ± 3
316 ± 123
0.4 ± 0.0
0.505
0.920
0.764
0.548
0.512
0.286
0.764
0.815
0.010
0.041
0.973
0.011
0.040
0.219
0.050
0.028
0.193
0.003
0.023
0.021
0.043
0.004
0.013
0.298
0.458
0.587
0.158
0.017
0.298
0.202
0.479
0.003
0.255
0.6 ± 0.0
15.2 ± 14
0.0 ± 0.0
4760 ± 42
0.0 ± 0.0
3027 ± 27
0.02 ± 0.0
39784±
15.3 ± 6
383 ± 127
0.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.0
14.7 ± 12
0.0 ± 0.0
4982 ± 28
0.00 ± 0.0
3224 ± 40
0.01 ± 0.0
56214±
11.2 ± 4
259 ± 113
0.4 ± 0.1
0.7 ± 0.0
5.2 ± 3
0.0 ± 0.0
4876 ± 17
0.00 ± 0.0
3680 ± 24
0.00 ± 0.0
20602±
11.3 ± 4.5
381 ± 144
0.6 ± 0.1
0.903
0.790
0.004
0.017
0.004
0.128
0.586
0.234
0.036
0.053
0.850
0.004
0.003
0.001
0.042
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.010
0.033
0.515
0.001
<0.001
0.001
0.179
0.182
0.036
<0.001
0.001
0.001
0.947
0.013
0.001
0.0 ± 0.0
39.5 ± 34
0.0 ± 0.0
4957 ± 34
0.0 ± 0.0
2959 ± 48
0.4 ± 0.0
15,5130
14.6 ± 7
274 ± 158
0.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.0
11.6 ± 11
0.0 ± 0.0
5009 ± 19
0.0 ± 0.0
3435 ± 33
0.0 ± 0.0
43333±
13.7 ± 4
329 ± 125
0.5 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
45.1 ± 11
0.0 ± 0.0
4993 ± 33
0.0 ± 0.0
3088 ± 49
0.0 ± 0.0
158875±
12.2 ± 3.9
224 ± 111
0.4 ± 0.1
0.006
0.002
0.097
0.306
0.266
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.868
0.136
0.003
0.588
0.414
0.053
0.296
0.163
0.399
0.177
0.425
0.364
0.313
0.557
0.071
0.055
0.934
0.868
0.438
0.024
0.080
0.046
0.438
0.013
0.071

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient;Exc. kurtosis, excess kurtosis; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix;GLNU, gray-level non-uniformity; GLRLM, gray-level run-length matrix;GLZLM, gray-level zone length matrix; HGRE, high gray-level run emphasis;HGZE, high gray-level zone emphasis; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy;HU, Hounsfield unit; LGRE, low gray-level run emphasis;LGZE, low gray-level zone emphasis;LRE, long-run emphasis; LRHGE, long-run high gray-level emphasis;LRLGE, long-run low gray-level emphasis; LZE, long-zone emphasis;LZHGE, long-zone high gray-level emphasis; LZLGE, long-zone low gray-level emphasis;NGLDM, neighborhood gray-level difference matrix; RLNU, run length non-uniformity;RP, run percentage;SRE, short-run emphasis;SRHGE, short-run high gray-level emphasis; SRLGE, short-run low gray-level emphasis;SZE, short-zone emphasis; SZHGE, short-zone high gray-level emphasis;SZLGE, short-zone low gray-level emphasis; ZLNU, zone length non-uniformity;ZP, zone percentage.

Bold values mean statistically significant.

aComparison of the texture features values between the control and mild HIE groups.

bComparison of the texture features values between the control and moderate-to-severe HIE groups.

cComparison of the texture features values between the mild and moderate-to-severe HIE groups.

The comparison of the basal ganglia texture feature values between the groups for each sequence is shown in Table 2. The numbers of the texture features which showed significantly differences between the HIE groups were 21 on the ADC maps, 22 on T1W images, 13 on T1W images. Only texture parameters that had p values lesser than 0.001 between the HIE groups were considered for the diagnostic performances due to the high number of statistically significant texture features. 7 of 21 texture features including 3 HISTO features (entropy log10, entropy log2, and energy), 3 GLCM features (entropy log10, entropy log2, and energy), 1 NGLDM feature (contrast) on the ADC maps and 2 GLZLM features (short-zone emphasis and short-zone high gray-level emphasis) of 22 texture features on T1W images had p values lesser than 0.001.

The comparison of the thalami texture feature values between the groups for each sequence is presented in Table 3. There were 21 significantly different texture features on the ADC maps, 22 on T1W images, and 3 on T2W images between the HIE groups. Among them, 1 GLZLM feature (zone length non-uniformity) on the ADC maps and 1 NGLDM feature (busyness) on T1W images had p values lesser than 0.001.

Table 3. Comparison of the texture feature values of the thalami between the groups

Texture featuresADC-mapsT1-weighted imagingT2-weighted imaging
ControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuecControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuecControlMild HIEModerate-to-severe
HIE
p- valueap- valuebp- valuec
Conventional
HU_min
HU_mean
HU_std
HU_max
HU_Q1
HU_Q2
HU_Q3
562 ± 98
995 ± 15
180 ± 45
1520 ± 29
755 ± 186
978 ± 152
1153 ± 27
542 ± 69
915 ± 155
186 ± 35
1361 ± 21548±165
922 ± 143
1039 ± 21
526 ± 121
941 ± 190
198 ± 37
1390 ± 30
767 ± 175
965 ± 203
1110 ± 23
0.570
0.054
0.929
0.093
0.415
0.036
0.053
215
0.551
0.189
0.263
0.259
0.614
0.963
0.542
0.419
0.254
0.755
0.458
0.330
0.330
135 ± 88
237 ± 134
43 ± 35
334 ± 207
196 ± 101
238 ± 136
273 ± 162
172 ± 93
296 ± 180
61 ± 37
422 ± 245
231 ± 148
297 ± 179
350 ± 211
186 ± 109
297 ± 167
55 ± 38
414 ± 233
243 ± 132
302 ± 171
346 ± 200
0.271
0.322
0.073
0.217
0.714
0.344
0.261
0.212
0.202
0.279
0.142
0.236
0.189
0.163
0.730
0.961
0.610
0.987
0.657
0.908
0.987
267 ± 102
503 ± 178
84 ± 45
700 ± 260
434 ± 145
509 ± 185
575 ± 217
351 ± 223
618 ± 339
130 ± 84
906 ± 411
491 ± 322
627 ± 398
740 ± 373
421 ± 288
712 ± 467
139 ± 92
991 ± 458
585 ± 285
728 ± 378
831 ± 337
0.697
0.798
0.133
0.764
0.938
0.714
0.730
0.627
0.693
0.090
0.686
0.707
0.660
0.588
0.400
0.419
0.633
0.542
0.458
0.400
0.438
Shape
SHAPE_Vol(mL)
SHAPE_Vol(vx)
0.5 ± 0.2
1513 ± 40
0.5 ± 0.0
1457 ± 56
0.5 ± 0.1
1397 ± 67
0.903
0.903
0.331
0.331
0.419
0.419
0.5 ± 0.0
1430 ± 26
0.5 ± 0.0
1477 ± 27
0.5 ± 0.0
1403 ± 24
0.609
0.609
0.557
0.545
0.347
0.330
0.5 ± 0.0
1412 ± 12
0.5 ± 0.0
1486 ± 64
0.5 ± 0.0
1412 ± 64
0.917
0.917
0.994
0.994
0.917
0.917
Histogram
Skewness
Kurtosis
Exc. kurtosis
Entropy-log10
Entropy-log2
Energy
–0.0 ± 0.2
3 ± 0.2
0.1 ± 0.2
1.8 ± 0.0
6 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.1
1.9 ± 0.2
–1 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.0
5.9 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.2
2.1 ± 0.7
–0.8 ± 0.7
1.8 ± 0.0
6.1 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
885
0.085
0.085
0.270
0.243
0.519
0.491
0.840
0.847
0.033
0.043
0.004
0.298
0.086
0.086
0.011
0.012
0.013
–0.6 ± 0.0
2.1 ± 0.6
–0.8 ± 0.0
1.7 ± 0.0
5.8 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.0 ± 0.2
1.8 ± 0.4
–1.1 ± 0.4
1.73 ± 0.0
5.75 ± 0.2
0.02 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.2
2.3 ± 0.8
–0.6 ± 0.8
1.81 ± 0.0
6.01 ± 0.2
0.01 ± 0.0
0.002
0.050
0.050
0.067
0.083
0.114
0.001
0.491
0.491
0.058
0.059
0.043
0.099
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.009
–0.3 ± 0.4
3.5 ± 2.7
0.5 ± 2.7
1.8 ± 0.0
6 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.1
1.7 ± 0.2
–1.2 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.0
5.7 ± 0.3
0.0 ± 0.0
–0.1 ± 0.2
1.9 ± 0.6
–1 ± 0.6
1.7 ± 0.0
5.8 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.014
0.023
0.128
0.001
0.001
0.046
0.043
0.202
0.021
0.400
0.400
0.402
0.386
0.330
GLCM
Homogeneity
Energy
Contrast
Correlation
Entropy-log10
Entropy-log2
Dissimilarity
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
275 ± 114
0.6 ± 0.2
2.8 ± 0.2
9.3 ± 0.8
12.9 ± 4.8
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
425 ± 92
0.4 ± 0.1
2.5 ± 0.1
8.6 ± 0.4
17.2 ± 1.8
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
343 ± 118
0.5 ± 0.1
2.7 ± 0.1
9.2 ± 0.5
15 ± 3.6
0.001
0.747
0.025
0.028
0.632
0.632
0.019
0.189
0.404
0.142
0.119
0.192
0.192
0.157
0.240
0.001
0.023
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.069
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
439 ± 276
0.4 ± 0.2
2.7 ± 0.2
8.7 ± 0.6
15.2 ± 5.2
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
537 ± 252
0.2 ± 0.2
2.5 ± 0.1
8.5 ± 0.4
19.1 ± 4.5
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
374 ± 283
0.5 ± 0.3
2.7 ± 0.1
9 ± 0.6
15.1 ± 6
0.234
0.033
0.119
0.035
0.046
0.429
0.011
0.073
0.271
0.279
0.620
0.383
0.023
0.840
0.380
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.012
0.012
0.005
0.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
376 ± 208
0.5 ± 0.3
2.8 ± 0.2
9.3 ± 0.9
13.6 ± 6.1
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
497 ± 215
0.3 ± 0.2
2.6 ± 0.1
8.7 ± 0.6
18.6 ± 3.5
0.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
371 ± 120
0.4 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.1
8.9 ± 0.4
15.8 ± 3.7
0.019
0.062
0.073
0.014
0.077
0.073
0.004
0.186
0.364
0.446
0.142
0.192
0.183
0.039
0.254
0.330
0.400
0.254
0.289
0.295
0.458
GLRLM
SRE
LRE
LGRE
HGRE
SRLGE
SRHGE
LRLGE
LRHGE
GLNU
RLNU
RP
0.9 ± 0.0
1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0
4636 ± 33
0.0 ± 0
4463 ± 50
0.0 ± 0.0
5702 ± 37
41.4 ± 10
2113 ± 34
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4652 ± 23
0.0 ± 0.0
4481 ± 34
0.0 ± 0.0
5929 ± 48
22.6 ± 6.8
1110 ± 18
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4641 ± 17
0.0 ± 0.0
4490 ± 85
0.0 ± 0.0
5599 ± 61
27.4 ± 11
1489 ± 72
0.9 ± 0.0
0.001
0.102
0.051
0.865
0.601
0.002
0.033
0.095
0.002
0.024
0.005
0.081
0.927
0.051
0.423
0.202
0.181
0.287
0.978
0.012
0.026
0.225
0.036
0.021
0.542
0.254
0.191
0.046
0.114
0.008
0.521
0.014
0.043
0.9 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4638 ± 40
0.0 ± 0.0
4438 ± 78
0.0 ± 0.0
5873 ± 79
57.3 ± 50
2633 ± 22
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4655 ± 19
0.0 ± 0.0
4490 ± 28
0.0 ± 0.0
5648 ± 36
29.7 ± 9.9
1218 ± 31
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4636 ± 36
0.0 ± 0.0
4487 ± 54
0.0 ± 0.0
5416 ± 27
22.2 ± 11
1111 ± 53
0.9 ± 0.0
0.483
0.807
0.001
0.048
0.003
0.030
0.093
0.632
0.136
0.014
0.463
0.046
0.048
0.001
0.678
0.006
0.012
0.013
0.064
0.001
0.001
0.061
0.096
0.023
0.499
0.069
0.107
0.587
0.131
0.041
0.059
0.419
0.079
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4636 ± 20
0.0 ± 0.0
4457 ± 49
0.0 ± 0.0
5720 ± 60
40 ± 19
2126 ± 12
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4650 ± 22
0.0 ± 0.0
4485 ± 55
0.0 ± 0.0
5652 ± 78
32.1 ± 8
1350 ± 26
0.9 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
4638 ± 22
0.0 ± 0.0
4471 ± 70
0.0 ± 0.0
5537 ± 34
28.9 ± 11
1309 ± 38
0.9 ± 0.0
0.136
0.225
0.000
0.057
0.001
0.048
0.001
0.221
0.625
0.164
0.112
0.225
0.368
0.007
0.455
0.020
0.088
0.001
0.354
0.055
0.052
0.192
0.681
0.805
0.030
0.283
0.107
0.681
0.382
0.730
0.367
0.730
0.681
NGLDM
Coarseness
Contrast
Busyness
0.0 ± 0.0
0.7 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.3 ± 0.4
0.0 ± 0.2
0.0 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.3
0.0 ± 0.0
0.868
0.022
0.023
0.354
0.099
0.527
0.107
0.011
0.234
0.0 ± 0.0
1.1 ± 0.8
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.9 ± 1.0
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 1.5
0.0 ± 0.0
0.065
0.006
0.052
0.279
0.720
0.097
0.017
0.003
<0.001
0.0 ± 0.0
0.9 ± 0.8
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.7 ± 1.3
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
1.2 ± 0.6
0.0 ± 0.0
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.393
0.054
0.061
0.007
0.179
0.122
GLZLM
SZE
LZE
LGZE
HGZE
SZLGE
SZHGE
LZLGE
LZHGE
GLNU
ZLNU
ZP
0.6 ± 0.0
13.8 ± 7
0.0 ± 0
5043 ± 39
0.0 ± 0
3447 ± 79
0.1 ± 0.0
54193±
17.8 ± 9
472 ± 31
0.4 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.0
16 ± 11
0.0 ± 0.0
5086 ± 27
0.0 ± 0.0
3314 ± 29
0.0 ± 0.0
61060±
9.4 ± 1.9
207 ± 76
0.4 ± 0.0
0.67 ± 0.0
11 ± 19.5
0.0 ± 0.0
4955 ± 23
0.0 ± 0.0
3467 ± 42
0.0 ± 0.0
51040±
12 ± 4.7
366 ± 156
0.5 ± 0.0
0.151
0.007
0.681
0.114
0.807
0.697
0.002
0.007
0.051
0.456
0.010
0.847
0.317
0.244
0.862
0.326
0.601
0.052
0.425
0.006
0.104
0.503
0.006
0.050
0.438
0.135
0.179
0.021
0.080
0.021
0.008
<0.001
0.013
0.6 ± 0.0
21.3 ± 22
0.0 ± 0.0
4914 ± 55
0.0 ± 0.0
3351 ± 36
1.6 ± 0.6
152953±
22.2 ± 20
529 ± 127
0.4 ± 0.1
0.63 ± 0.0
11.7 ± 7
0.00 ± 0.0
5104 ± 26
0.0 ± 0.0
3408 ± 33
0.0 ± 0.0
43552±
12.4 ± 3.5
256 ± 112
0.4 ± 0.1
0.72 ± 0.1
7.12 ± 6.1
0.0 ± 0.0
4916 ± 27
0.0 ± 0.0
3654 ± 32
0.0 ± 0.0
26520±
11.5 ± 5.1
341 ± 175
0.6 ± 0.1
0.714
0.463
0.004
0.122
0.007
0.833
0.034
0.398
0.130
0.097
0.947
0.001
0.009
0.013
0.993
0.108
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.017
0.755
0.034
0.008
0.043
0.069
0.050
0.012
0.013
0.122
0.030
0.547
0.107
0.017
0.6 ± 0.0
17.1 ± 23
0.0 ± 0.0
4956 ± 30
0.0 ± 0.0
3259 ± 40
0.2 ± 0.7
68475±
17.3 ± 8.9
461 ± 323
0.4 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.0
17 ± 33.1
0.0 ± 0.0
5014 ± 22
0.0 ± 0.0
3390 ± 37
0.0 ± 0.0
62193±
13.9 ± 3.3
319 ± 145
0.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.0
11.3 ± 13
0.0 ± 0.0
4893 ± 24
0.0 ± 0.0
3343 ± 35
0.0 ± 0.0
50008±
13 ± 2.9
302. ± 97
0.5 ± 0.1
0.221
0.112
0.003
0.697
0.018
0.322
0.006
0.070
0.570
0.436
0.130
0.563
0.074
0.036
0.457
0.095
0.653
0.005
0.047
0.219
0.193
0.189
0.681
0.831
0.254
0.330
0.479
0.961
0.831
0.908
0.403
0.687
0.694

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient;Exc. kurtosis, excess kurtosis; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; GLNU, gray-level non-uniformity; GLRLM, gray-level run-length matrix; GLZLM, graylevel zone length matrix; HGRE, high gray-level run emphasis; HGZE, high gray-level zone emphasis; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; HU, Hounsfield unit; LGRE, low gray-level run emphasis; LGZE, low gray-level zone emphasis; LRE, long-run emphasis; LRHGE, long-run high gray-level emphasis; LRLGE, long-run low gray-level emphasis; LZE, long-zone emphasis; LZHGE, long-zone high gray-level emphasis; LZLGE, long-zone low gray-level emphasis; NGLDM, neighborhood gray-level difference matrix; RLNU, run length non-uniformity; RP, run percentage; SRE, short-run emphasis; SRHGE, short-run high gray-level emphasis; SRLGE, short-run low gray-level emphasis; SZE, short-zone emphasis; SZHGE, shortzone high gray-level emphasis; SZLGE, short-zone low gray-level emphasis; ZLNU, zone length non-uniformity; ZP, zone percentage.

Bold values mean statistically significant.

aComparison of the texture features values between the control and mild HIE groups.

bComparison of the texture features values between the control and moderate-to-severe HIE groups.

cComparison of the texture features values between the mild and moderate-to-severe HIE groups.

Table 4 presents the ROC curve analyses and diagnostic performances for the texture features that had p values lesser than 0.001 between the HIE groups.

Table 4. The diagnostic performances of the texture features on the basal ganglia and thalami for predicting the moderate-to-severe HIE

Sequence and texture featureArea under the curve (95% CI)Cut-off valueSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Diagnostic accuracy (%)
Basal ganglia
ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log10
ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log2
ADC map-HISTO_Energy
ADC map-GLCM_Energy
ADC map-GLCM_Entropy-log10
ADC map-GLCM_Entropy-log2
ADC map-NGLDM_Contrast
T1W-GLZLM_SZE
T1W-GLZLM_SZHGE
0.982 (0.946–1.000)
0.989 (0.942–1.000)
0.957 (0.896–1.000)
0.857 (0.717–0.996)
0.877 (0.754–1.000)
0.877 (0.754–0.999)
0.867 (0.722–1.000)
0.855 (0.715–0.995)
0.882 (0.749–1.000)
 >1.80
 >5.98
 <0.0183
 <0.0032
 >2.63
 >8.75
 <1.32
 >0.668
 >3380
95
95
95
85
95
95
95
80
95
93
93
87
74
74
74
80
87
74
94.3
94.3
91.4
80.0
80.0
82.9
88.6
80.0
85.7
Thalami
ADC map-GLZLM_ZLNU
T1W-NGLDM_Busyness
0.868 (0.742–0.994)
0.837 (0.695–0.979)
>274.5
<0.0645
85
85
80
80
82.9
82.9

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; CI, confidence interval; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; GLZLM, gray-level zone length matrix; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; HISTO, histogram; NGLDM, neighborhood gray-level difference matrix; SZE, short-zone emphasis; SZHGE, short-zone high graylevel emphasis; T1W, T1- weighted; ZLNU, zone length non-uniformity.

Logistic regression analysis

Binary logistic regression analysis was used to specify the independent predictors for the moderate-to-severe HIE among all texture features that had p values lesser than 0.001. Using a basal ganglia HISTO_entropy log-10 value of higher than 1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value of higher than 5.98 on the ADC maps were found as independent features for predicting the moderate-to-severe HIE (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 266; confidence interval [CI], 15.2–4628.4). The absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images (p = 0.012; OR, 17.11; CI, 1.8–156.2) was found as an independent finding among the radiological features.

Table 5 and Figure 3 summarize the comparison of the diagnostic performances of the independent predictors and their combination. Using only a basal ganglia HISTO_entropy log-10 value of higher than 1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value of higher than 5.98 on the ADC maps had equally diagnostic yields when compared to its' combination with the absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

ROC curves of using HISTO_entropy log 10 cut-off value and predictive models that were created by the combination of the HISTO_entropy log 10 value, other texture features, and absence of the hyperintense PLIC on T1 weighted images. The cut-off values obtained from the ADC maps were used for HISTO_Entropy-log10, GLCM_entropy log 2, NGLDM_contrast, and GLZLM_ZLNU. The cut-off value obtained from the T1 weighted images was used for NGLDM_busyness. ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; GLCM, gray-level co-occurrence matrix; GLZLM, gray-level zone length matrix; HISTO, histogram; NGLDM, neighborhood gray-level difference matrix; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ZLNU, zone length non-uniformity

Table 5. The diagnostic performances of the texture features with the cut-off values, radiological findings, and their combined-model to predict the moderate-to-severe HIEa

Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Accuracy (%)
ADC map-HISTO_Entropy-log10b95 (73.0–99.7)93.3 (66.0–99.6)9593.394.3
Absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1 weighted images55 (32.0–76.1)93.3 (66.0–99.6)91.660.871.4
The combined-modelc95 (73–99.7)93.3 (66–99.6)9593.394.3

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient;HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; HISTO, histogram; PLIC, the posterior limb of the internal capsule.

aNumbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

bHISTO_Entropy-log10 cut-off value on the ADC maps was obtained from the basal ganglia. The cut-off value was higher than 1.8. Using a HISTO_Entropy-log2 cut- off value (>5.98) on the ADC maps had same results as using a HISTO_Entropy-log10.

cThe combined-model indicates to the combination of the cut-off value of HISTO_Entropy-log10 on the ADC maps and absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1 weighted images.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that MRI-based TA of the basal ganglia and thalami allows for accurate diagnosis of moderate-to-severe HIE in neonates. We found that using only a HISTO_entropy log-10 value as >1.8 or a HISTO_entropy log-2 value as >5.98 that were obtained from the basal ganglia on the ADC maps had an exquisite diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 93.3, and a diagnostic accuracy of 94.3. The combined-models that were used together with the HISTO_entropy log-10 cutoff value, either the radiological findings or other significant texture parameters, had not significant contributions for the differentiation of moderate-to-severe HIE from mild HIE when compared to using HISTO_entropy log-10 alone. We also demonstrated that several texture parameters from basal ganglia and thalami had high diagnostic accuracy for predicting the severity of HIE. Besides these, we presented the texture feature values of the basal ganglia and thalami in normal neonates with comparisons of those of HIE groups.

Although conventional and further techniques of brain MRI findings in neonates with HIE have been described,1,5,17,19–25 to our best knowledge, this is the first article that evaluated the diagnostic yield of TA for differentiating moderate-to-severe HIE from mild HIE. In 2019, Weiss et al26 proclaimed that they will work on a study protocol including radiomics that will provide MRI‐based HIE lesion detection and outcome prediction. However, their results have not been published yet. Apart from this, Kim et al27 investigated the feasibility of the deep medullary veins TA in infants with developmental and ischemic injury. The authors performed their study by only using first-order histogram analysis and including very few infants. Despite several technical and methodologic differences when compared to our study, they also reported that the texture features can potentially be used as quantitative markers for differentiating infants with ischemic injury through deep medullary vein changes.

A series of quantitative imaging features can be extracted from MRI-based TA. The first-order statistical feature, also called the histogram, is the distribution of voxel intensities within the ROI by various basic features, such as skewness, kurtosis, entropy, and energy of gray level intensity. Entropy is defined as randomness and a measure of the amount of uncertainty in a source.28 Although it is not possible to interpret precisely, we can claim that a larger value of entropy may indicate a stronger heterogeneity of intensity values since higher results than threshold value point out the moderate-to-severe HIE according to our findings. In addition to the excellent diagnostic performance of the HISTO_entropy values, second-order features including GLCM, NGLDM, and GLZLM values, which describe the statistical relationships between pixels or voxels, were also found as notably useful texture parameters for discriminating between the mild and moderate-to-severe HIE in this study. Considering the diagnostic utility of the features as well as the short application time, we believe that MRI-based radiomics may be used as a diagnostic tool in daily practice.

According to our results, there were several statistically significant texture parameters between the normal neonates and mild HIE and moderate-to-severe HIE. Although, the deep gray matter injury does not an expected finding in the mild hypoxic injury,5 we could speculate that TA might show the imperceptible findings in the deep gray matter on conventional MRI.

Although the involvement of the basal ganglia and thalamus usually occurs in the setting of the moderate-to-severe hypoxic injury, the detection of the signal abnormalities is highly related to the timing of the imaging. There was no difference regarding to the time from birth to MRI between the mild (5.6 days) and moderate-to-severe HIE (5.9 days) groups (p = 0.419). Imai et al29 investigated the early (1–3 days) and late (4–7 days) MRI changes in the thalamus and basal ganglia in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. They reported that ADC values were lower in the thalami in the early period while the values were lower in the basal ganglia in the late period. Although we found significant thalamic texture feature values in the ADC maps for differentiating the groups, the area under curve results, the significance of values, and the number of significant parameters were superior for the basal ganglia measurements. It may be related to the mean time of the imaging in our study group.

Considering the radiological findings, an absence of hyperintensity of the PLIC on T1W images was found as an independent predictor the moderate-to-severe HIE (p = 0.012). Due to the high specificity value (93.3%) of this finding, we can comment that the high signal intensity in the PLIC on T1W images indicates to the mild HIE in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Although the finding was found as an independent predictor, the diagnostic accuracy (71.4%) was not substantial, especially compared with the values of TA (93.3%).

Liauw et al25 reported the combination of T1W, T2W, and DWI as the best for detecting cerebral damage in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. T2W images are also usually used for a confirmation of the signal intensity abnormalities which are detected on T1W images.5 We used these three sequences in TA for two main reasons. First and foremost, we can gain substantial information from TA which is not detected on visual inspection. The second reason was that we did not want to overlook the contributes of the sequences since the best time for the depiction of the brain damage varies in each sequence.4,5,20

In terms of the utility of the radiomic features, new studies have been adding to the literature continuously. There are a few studies in the literature on the use of basal ganglia TA features in different diseases.30,31 Johns et al30 found that the basal ganglia texture features significantly differ in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In another study, it is suggested that the basal ganglia TA can be used for evaluating the blood-brain integrity in small vessel disease.31 This is the first study which presented the diagnostic role of the MRI-based TA to predict the severity of hypoxic injury in neonates with asphyxia. We investigated the texture features in both basal ganglia and thalami on DWI, T1W, and T2W images to reveal the microchanges in hypoxic injury. Also, we included the control group to demonstrate the normal texture features values and to reveal microstructural changes in neonates with asphyxia with normal-appearanced brain MRI. These are the major strengths of this study.

Our study had several limitations. First, the study had a retrospective design and the study sample was small. Second, the ROIs of the basal ganglia and thalami were selected on axial images as two-dimensional. Neonates have fewer slice numbers due to their relatively smaller field of view. We thought that it was not ideal to delineate the ROI in multiple slices especially in the ADC maps. Third, although radiological findings and metabolite values on MRI-spectroscopy could be changed after the hypothermia treatment,32,33 we did not exclude the neonates who underwent hypothermia treatment since it was one of the routine procedures for severe perinatal asphyxia in many centers. Fourth, as it is known, various imaging protocols may potentially affect the TA. To handle this issue, we used preprocessing steps to normalize the voxel sizes and homogenize the pixel discretization. However, the variety of some of the imaging parameters that could not be normalized, such as TR and TE values of the sequences, might be one of the limitations of this work. There could be more reliable results with using the same imaging protocols for all patients. In addition to this, the timing of imaging, which is an important determinant of radiological findings in patients with HIE, may also have an effect on the TA. So, further studies with different protocols are needed to verify the reproducibility and feasibility of our results. Fifth, cerebral cortex, which is one of the affected areas in severe perinatal asphyxia,34 was not considered in TA since we thought that the discrimination of the ROI in the cortical gray matter would not be reliable. Sixth, the low TR values may have negatively affected the optimization of signal-noise ratio to achieve good gray-white matter differentiation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results suggest that using only HISTO_entropy values of the basal ganglia on the ADC maps allows for accurate diagnosis of the moderate-to-severe HIE in neonates. TA may generate objective features that are able to indicate differences in the basal ganglia and thalami, even if there is no visually detectable difference, in neonates with perinatal asphyxia. Although implementing tools for TA is relatively simple and can be applied for many imaging techniques, further studies are needed until these methods can be used reliably in clinical practice.

REFERENCES